On Thursday 04 April 2002 1:24 pm, Franck Routier wrote:
> That's what I understood as well, but what I don't get is how this compares
> to other hype technologies like Corba, J2EE, .Net, dotgnu, ...
>
> Should it be considered similar or related, or is it something different,
> or even complementa
On Thursday 04 April 2002 1:24 pm, Franck Routier wrote:
> That's what I understood as well, but what I don't get is how this compares
> to other hype technologies like Corba, J2EE, .Net, dotgnu, ...
>
> Should it be considered similar or related, or is it something different,
> or even complement
That's what I understood as well, but what I don't get is how this compares
to other hype technologies like Corba, J2EE, .Net, dotgnu, ...
Should it be considered similar or related, or is it something different,
or even complementary ?
My first thought was that it is a over-ambitious project,
That's what I understood as well, but what I don't get is how this compares
to other hype technologies like Corba, J2EE, .Net, dotgnu, ...
Should it be considered similar or related, or is it something different,
or even complementary ?
My first thought was that it is a over-ambitious project,
Hi,
I haven't used Jtrix, but after your message I visited their web-site.
I found the "An introduction for everyone" enlightening, as it includes
a detailed example of the kind of problem they try to solve.
If I understood right: the idea is to offer developpers of network based
applications (ty
Hi,
I haven't used Jtrix, but after your message I visited their web-site.
I found the "An introduction for everyone" enlightening, as it includes
a detailed example of the kind of problem they try to solve.
If I understood right: the idea is to offer developpers of network based
applications
6 matches
Mail list logo
