That would be good for me. I'm repackaging 1.1.1 with DBS so hopefully I
can get it out the door quick enough to no longer require the NMU.
Quoting Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'll be away a couple of days next week to it will be best if I delay
> the NMU by one week so I can quickly
That would be good for me. I'm repackaging 1.1.1 with DBS so hopefully I
can get it out the door quick enough to no longer require the NMU.
Quoting Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'll be away a couple of days next week to it will be best if I delay
> the NMU by one week so I can quickly
Stefan Gybas wrote:
Anthony's mail also mentions a liberal policy for NMUs between next
Saturday and September 14th. I will therefore NMU Kaffe 1.1.1 next
Monday (August 25th) if Ean has not uploaded his package until than.
I'll be away a couple of days next week to it will be best if I delay
th
Stefan Gybas wrote:
Anthony's mail also mentions a liberal policy for NMUs between next
Saturday and September 14th. I will therefore NMU Kaffe 1.1.1 next
Monday (August 25th) if Ean has not uploaded his package until than.
I'll be away a couple of days next week to it will be best if I delay
t
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 19:06, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Takashi Okamoto wrote:
>
> > So, ant depends on a lot of packages. Should we put them into main in
> > the first for putting ant into main?
>
> Almost all of these dependecies are for ant-optional.jar. However, most
> other Java packages will on
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 19:06, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Takashi Okamoto wrote:
>
> > So, ant depends on a lot of packages. Should we put them into main in
> > the first for putting ant into main?
>
> Almost all of these dependecies are for ant-optional.jar. However, most
> other Java packages will on
Takashi Okamoto wrote:
So, ant depends on a lot of packages. Should we put them into main in
the first for putting ant into main?
Almost all of these dependecies are for ant-optional.jar. However, most
other Java packages will only need ant.jar to build so I think it makes
sense to split ant-1.5.
Takashi Okamoto wrote:
So, ant depends on a lot of packages. Should we put them into main in
the first for putting ant into main?
Almost all of these dependecies are for ant-optional.jar. However, most
other Java packages will only need ant.jar to build so I think it makes
sense to split ant-1.5
From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Intend to NMU Kaffe 1.1
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:59:14 +0200
> As soon as libant1.5-java has been accepted by the FTP masters, I'll
> upload libservlet2.2-java for main and start working on some other Java
> library packages, first of all BCEL: Ant
From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Intend to NMU Kaffe 1.1
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:59:14 +0200
> As soon as libant1.5-java has been accepted by the FTP masters, I'll
> upload libservlet2.2-java for main and start working on some other Java
> library packages, first of all BCEL: Ant
10 matches
Mail list logo
