Re: Installing non-debian java tar

2003-09-13 Thread Tomasz Rola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Installing a non-debian java tar has proven to be > quite a pain in the ass on Debian woody. I had to > go with the tar file because IBM is the only java > distribution that offers Java 1.4 for a Powe

Re: Installing non-debian java tar

2003-09-13 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo wcrowshaw, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Installing a non-debian java tar has proven to be >quite a pain in the ass on Debian woody. It's not only a PITA on woody... >While I had it set up and running pretty well, my set up >pretty much gets messed up everytime I run dselect. Please see t

Re: Installing non-debian java tar

2003-09-13 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo wcrowshaw, Maybe... * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >At this point, I've lost the ability to run java by >simply calling "java" from the CLI. You mean it worked before you messed with dselect? >Currently it >complains the following: >JVM not found: libjvm.so - libjvm.so This looks like it c

Re: Installing non-debian java tar

2003-09-13 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo wcrowshaw, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Installing a non-debian java tar has proven to be >quite a pain in the ass on Debian woody. It's not only a PITA on woody... >While I had it set up and running pretty well, my set up >pretty much gets messed up everytime I run dselect. Please see t

Re: Installing non-debian java tar

2003-09-13 Thread Tomasz Rola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Installing a non-debian java tar has proven to be > quite a pain in the ass on Debian woody. I had to > go with the tar file because IBM is the only java > distribution that offers Java 1.4 for a Powe

Re: Installing non-debian java tar

2003-09-13 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo wcrowshaw, Maybe... * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >At this point, I've lost the ability to run java by >simply calling "java" from the CLI. You mean it worked before you messed with dselect? >Currently it >complains the following: >JVM not found: libjvm.so - libjvm.so This looks like it c