On 30.11.2017 13:43, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Do you know if Oracle intends to keep contributing Java LTS updates to
OpenJDK beyond the 6 months window (i.e. after March 2019 for Java 11)?
In the past, Oracle's plans for the duration of its contributions to an
OpenJDK update release series have
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 30/11/2017 à 14:31, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
>
> > Eek, that would break most of Debian’s stability promises.
> > People would lynch you.
>
> I know :) That's why I mentioned "near perfect backward compatibility"
> as a prerequisite.
Well, it’s n
Le 30/11/2017 à 14:31, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
> Eek, that would break most of Debian’s stability promises.
> People would lynch you.
I know :) That's why I mentioned "near perfect backward compatibility"
as a prerequisite.
Emmanuel Bourg
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > major (LTS or other) OpenJDK release during the lifetime of stable
> > release, maybe even on a regular cadence as a 'rolling' default.
>
> A rolling default JRE might be interesting, that would reduce the number
> of JDKs maintained (assuming unstab
Le 30/11/2017 à 12:31, dalibor topic a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> a few comments on the thread:
Thanks a lot for the input!
> * For JDK 9, I have posted
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2017-November/24.html
> regarding Oracle's planned contributions. In short, Oracle plans t
Hi,
a few comments on the thread:
* For JDK 9, I have posted
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2017-November/24.html
regarding Oracle's planned contributions. In short, Oracle plans to end
contributing JDK 9 Updates to OpenJDK with the end of public updates of
JDK 9
On 24.11.2017 11:05, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Oracle has recently announced a new release policy for Java [1][2], to
> sum it up:
> - new major Java revisions will now be released every 6 months
> - there will be non-LTS releases supported for 6 months, and LTS
> releases supported 5+ y
Am 27.11.2017 um 13:08 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> released in time before the freeze, we could try to make OpenJDK 11 the
>> default JRE but keep OpenJDK 8 as the default JDK. I think it is
>
> Eek, having more than one Java version on a system at
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Markus Koschany wrote:
> released in time before the freeze, we could try to make OpenJDK 11 the
> default JRE but keep OpenJDK 8 as the default JDK. I think it is
Eek, having more than one Java version on a system at a
given time invites trouble. (Yes, I know it works within
Am 24.11.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Hi all,
>
> Oracle has recently announced a new release policy for Java [1][2], to
> sum it up:
[...]
Well, like you said, provided that OpenJDK 11 is also a LTS version and
released in time before the freeze, we could try to make OpenJDK 11 the
d
10 matches
Mail list logo
