Re: How to manage multiple JVMs

Joe Emenaker wrote: > For this reason, I kinda have to keep JDK 1.0 around. However, I > sometimes need JDK 1.1 for other projects. As things stand now, I > either have to keep them on separate machines or wrestle with the > stuff in /etc/alternates. I've run into the same problem. (I've got sev

Re: How to manage multiple JVMs

Joe Emenaker wrote: > For this reason, I kinda have to keep JDK 1.0 around. However, I > sometimes need JDK 1.1 for other projects. As things stand now, I > either have to keep them on separate machines or wrestle with the > stuff in /etc/alternates. I've run into the same problem. (I've got se

Re: How to manage multiple JVMs

[Joe, a 72-column word-wrap would make reading your email significantly easier I have word-wrapped it in order to make my response at all intellegible...] * Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001019 01:34]: > As things stand now, I either have to keep them on separate machines > or wrestle with

Re: How to manage multiple JVMs

[Joe, a 72-column word-wrap would make reading your email significantly easier I have word-wrapped it in order to make my response at all intellegible...] * Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001019 01:34]: > As things stand now, I either have to keep them on separate machines > or wrestle wit