Re: eclipse status (and things you can help us with)

2009-12-09 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le mercredi 09 décembre 2009 à 17:42 -0500, Pablo Duboue a écrit : > I see. I have no committers right (I'm not a DD), so I can produce a > patch against pkg-java SVN with these changes and send it to somebody > (you? debian-java?) for upload. You don't have to be DD to have write permissions on th

Re: eclipse status (and things you can help us with)

2009-12-09 Thread Pablo Duboue
I see. I have no committers right (I'm not a DD), so I can produce a patch against pkg-java SVN with these changes and send it to somebody (you? debian-java?) for upload. Alternatively, as I now realize a task labeled "upload" might be a bad match without committer rights :) I can just take the ma

Re: eclipse status (and things you can help us with)

2009-12-09 Thread Niels Thykier
Pablo Duboue wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> Things you can do to help us: >> * Help me with the jetty upload. Upstream helped out - it just needs to >> be merged with our packaging. [1] > > I'd like to help with this. What is the deliverable? A merged

Re: Eclipse status?

2005-06-27 Thread puttr00
Get your packages here: http://www.kaffe.org/~mkoch/eclipse/ Meer informatie over WML en hoe u met ons in contact kunt treden, vindt u op de website www.wml.nl De informatie verzonden met dit e-mail bericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Gebruik van deze informatie door anderen

Re: Eclipse status?

2005-06-25 Thread Jérôme Marant
Andrew Overholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Jérôme, > > On Fri, 2005-24-06 at 20:06 +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: >> Are there any plans to get it updated in Debian (3.0.2 upstream >> stable)? > > I'm not directly involved in the Debian efforts, but I work on Eclipse > on Fedora. Michael Koch

Re: Eclipse status?

2005-06-24 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi Jérôme, On Fri, 2005-24-06 at 20:06 +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Are there any plans to get it updated in Debian (3.0.2 upstream > stable)? I'm not directly involved in the Debian efforts, but I work on Eclipse on Fedora. Michael Koch blogged about the Eclipse packaging efforts here: http:/

Re: Eclipse Status

2005-06-11 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Sun, 5 Jun 2005 19:26:32 +0200, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:12:42AM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: >> Just wanted to let the general public know that I have actually uploaded >> Eclipse 3.0.1 to Ubuntu. This was made possible because I altered the >> lucene s

Tomcat5 status (was: Re: Eclipse Status)

2005-06-11 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Sun, 05 Jun 2005 11:12:42 -0500, Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tomcat is held up right now simply because Tomcat 4 won't compile with > a free JVM (com.sun.* problems I believe) and Tomcat 5 is not yet > packaged. I'm very busy at the moment with my day job and some of you already k

Re: Eclipse Status

2005-06-05 Thread Michael Koch
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:12:42AM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: > Just wanted to let the general public know that I have actually uploaded > Eclipse 3.0.1 to Ubuntu. This was made possible because I altered the > lucene sources to remove the offending RMIC pieces and stripped the > tomcat-based help