On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> If that means being able to install both versions side by side, and being
> able to redirect usage of ant using ANT_HOME (cdbs), then fine with me.
No, currently it is just a quick workaround for the dirty bug in gij.
That means you can eithe
Torsten Werner wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
We should think about having 2 versions of ant in Debian.
I mean: having 2 upstream major versions of ant by default and not
just as a quick fix as we have it now. But the unversioned ant should
always point to the l
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> We should think about having 2 versions of ant in Debian.
I mean: having 2 upstream major versions of ant by default and not
just as a quick fix as we have it now. But the unversioned ant should
always point to the latest stable release. Wh
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Well, just after ant 1.8 has been uploaded, we've got at least 10 FTBFS
> bugs.
But only some of them can be attributed to ant. Maven-invoker-plugin
uses maven (not ant) for building! Some FTBFS are caused by asm3 and
groovy uploads.
> I'm
Hello again,
sorry to reply to myself, but I wanted to install ant1.7 and found out
that it can't be installed in parallel with ant (1.8); as we might end
up with a situation where certain packages will build correctly with Ant
1.7 and others with 1.8, I'm not sure this is viable.
Any idea (
Hi Torsten,
Torsten Werner wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
I'm not a big Java specialist, just a packager, but we've seen quite a lot
of FTBFS bugs due to the upload of ant 1.8. I'm personally hit by one for
FreeMind, so I would support Matthias' suggestion until so
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> I'm not a big Java specialist, just a packager, but we've seen quite a lot
> of FTBFS bugs due to the upload of ant 1.8. I'm personally hit by one for
> FreeMind, so I would support Matthias' suggestion until someone explains
> what has actual
Hello,
Short version: +1
Matthias Klose wrote:
We are short before the freeze; the release architectures still include
architectures which require gij in it's current form (hppa,
kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64). Please either port OpenJDK to these
archs (hey, you're still an OpenJDK maintai
severity 571532 grave
thanks
On 27.02.2010 18:08, Torsten Werner wrote:
severity 571532 important
thanks
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
so why does 1.7 work, and not 1.8?
I have no idea why gij fails with bus error. I have uploaded a new
source package ant1.7 that c
severity 571532 important
thanks
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> so why does 1.7 work, and not 1.8?
I have no idea why gij fails with bus error. I have uploaded a new
source package ant1.7 that can be used by packages that are arch
dependent. Downgrading the severity be
10 matches
Mail list logo
