On Tuesday 7 September 1999, at 8 h 23, the keyboard of "Cris J. Holdorph"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks. Before you, nobody on debian-java was aware of the difference.
>
> I disagree. I was/am well aware of the difference between Java code and
> Java bytecode.
My English must be real
Stephane Bortzmeyer Writes:
> > In addition, you don't seem to be aware that the Java programming
> > language and the ".class" bytecode format are two entirely different
> > things,
>
> Thanks. Before you, nobody on debian-java was aware of the difference.
I disagree. I was/am well aware of th
On Monday 6 September 1999, at 16 h 7, the keyboard of [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As far as I can see, the java-common package is entirely pointless as
> regards java bytecode compilers and JVMs depending on it. It seems to
> contain absolutely nothing they could need.
java-common contains the
>Your package does not comply with the proposed Debian Java policy,
>which I intend to formally propose as a goal for potato. Therefore, could
>you:
>
>- make it compliant or,
>- explain why (it can be an error in the Policy, which I would like to
> fix).
>
>More specifically, bock fails because:
4 matches
Mail list logo
