On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:12:35PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> >>fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
> >>A "solution" to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1
> >>and also t
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>>fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
A "solution" to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1
and also to upload a new fop package with an embedded batik
library in the current versi
Michael Koch wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 10:28:08PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
Which one to use ?
g2d.setStroke( pi.strokeStroke ); ??
As said, I have no knowledge with awt - so if anyone can provide
the "right" solution I would prepare a new fop upload with the
patch. A batik 1.5.1 is already
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 10:28:08PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Koch wrote:
> >I would prefer to just add a patch to fop to make it work with batik
> >1.5.1 and just depend on batik >= 1.5.1. Putting a second batik copy
> >into fop should be avoided.
>
> You are right - t
Hi Michael,
Michael Koch wrote:
I would prefer to just add a patch to fop to make it work with batik
1.5.1 and just depend on batik >= 1.5.1. Putting a second batik copy
into fop should be avoided.
You are right - there is only one compile error - but I have absolutely
no experience with awt progra
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I prepared a package for the batik 1.5.1 upstream release.
> However during testing the package I realized that batik 1.5.1
> breaks fop ! As far as I see no other packages depend on
> libbatik-java.
>
> fop is currently not
6 matches
Mail list logo
