Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

2006-04-06 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Mladen Adamovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-14 10:16]: > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 > (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely > useless. Shame on them. Did you file bugs? I know we've improved in FC5 but I honestly don't t

Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

2006-03-16 Thread Mladen Adamovic
Arnaud Vandyck wrote: I don't know Fedora but I use Eclipse 3.1.2 built native with gcj, the package from Michael and I use it everyday now. It's really impressive and I don't have problems no more. I got problems but when trying to find out what it was, it was the latest WTP Eclipse plugin that

Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

2006-03-16 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mladen Adamovic wrote: [...] > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in > Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so > unstable that in fact it was completely useless. I don't know Fedora but I use Eclipse 3.1.2 built native with gcj, th

Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

2006-03-14 Thread Andrew Haley
Mladen Adamovic writes: > Andrew Haley wrote: > > > Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? > > > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 > > > (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely > > > useless. Shame

Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

2006-03-14 Thread Mladen Adamovic
Andrew Haley wrote: > Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 > (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely > useless. Shame on them. Excuse me while I go behind the o

Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

2006-03-14 Thread Andrew Haley
Mladen Adamovic writes: > robin putters wrote: > > How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, > > while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet? > Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora c

Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

2006-03-14 Thread Mladen Adamovic
robin putters wrote: How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet? Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so uns