Am 28.08.2015 um 22:16 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
[...]
>
> For the code to be compliant with DFSG does each one need a valid
> header, or is a statement from upstream sufficient? I also noticed a
> lot of image files used in Azureus and was not sure of their licence
> so I have asked about those too
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 18.08.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
> [...]
>
> I have made some minor changes and pushed them to the git repository. I
> hope that's OK. We should probably scale Azureus.png to 128x128 pixel
> (currently it is 128x131) to avoid
Am 18.08.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
[...]
> Thanks Markus.
>
> I have a sid desktop and I've been able to install and run the built
> package. I also started downloading a torrent to prove it's functional.
>
> My concern is over the copyright as there are a number of different
> copyri
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, 03:33 tony mancill wrote:
On 08/12/2015 04:35 PM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0,
Hi Stephen,
I haven't looked at the packaging yet, but I know that represents a lot
of work - awesome.
I wanted to mention one feature that ha
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, 23:11 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 13/08/2015 01:35, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0,
Well done Stephen! Do you think it's possible to backport it to Jessie,
or does the packaging depend on too many new elements found only in
te
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, 22:25 Markus Koschany wrote:
Am 13.08.2015 um 01:35 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0
>
I could successfully compile the package but I need a little bit more
time to dig into Azureus/Vuze. I'll get back to you within the next
On 08/12/2015 04:35 PM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0, as well as:
>
> - Removed bundled bouncy castle library
> - Removed bundled commons library
> - Removed bundled json simple library
> - Build against swt4
> - Updated the copyright file to corr
Le 13/08/2015 01:35, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0, as well as:
>
> - Removed bundled bouncy castle library
> - Removed bundled commons library
> - Removed bundled json simple library
> - Build against swt4
> - Updated the copyright file to corr
Am 13.08.2015 um 01:35 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0, as well as:
>
> - Removed bundled bouncy castle library
> - Removed bundled commons library
> - Removed bundled json simple library
> - Build against swt4
> - Updated the copyright file to cor
* Mladen Adamovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-14 10:16]:
> Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
> (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely
> useless. Shame on them.
Did you file bugs? I know we've improved in FC5 but I honestly don't t
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
I don't know Fedora but I use Eclipse 3.1.2 built native with gcj, the
package from Michael and I use it everyday now. It's really impressive
and I don't have problems no more. I got problems but when trying to
find out what it was, it was the latest WTP Eclipse plugin that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mladen Adamovic wrote:
[...]
> Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in
> Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so
> unstable that in fact it was completely useless.
I don't know Fedora but I use Eclipse 3.1.2 built native with gcj, th
Mladen Adamovic writes:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
> > > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
> > > (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely
> > > useless. Shame
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
> Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
> (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely
> useless. Shame on them.
Excuse me while I go behind the o
Mladen Adamovic writes:
> robin putters wrote:
> > How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental,
> > while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
> Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
> Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora c
robin putters wrote:
How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental,
while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
(Native Eclipse) and it was so uns
16 matches
Mail list logo
