On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:35:13PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 13:23 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
>
> > The submitter can move it to another package via command mail. See
> > instructions on http://bugs.debian.org/.
> >
> I've just sent a "reassign 298857 classpath" command to
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 13:23 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> The submitter can move it to another package via command mail. See
> instructions on http://bugs.debian.org/.
>
I've just sent a "reassign 298857 classpath" command to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I hope this works.
> Michael
>
Regards,
I.
P.S.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:21:22PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 13:12 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
>
> > If you wanna use online docs please use
> > http://developer.classpath.org/doc/ and report anything that can be made
> > better back to classpath.
> >
> Ok, fine. Thanks.
>
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 13:12 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> If you wanna use online docs please use
> http://developer.classpath.org/doc/ and report anything that can be made
> better back to classpath.
>
Ok, fine. Thanks.
> Urgh, the bug has to be against classpath, not devhelp.
>
I could fill a
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:01:02PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 12:20 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
>
> > classpath-doc will contain the API docs for classpath in the future.
> > They are not in there because of a bug in kaffe using too much memory
> > when running gjdoc. This doe
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 12:20 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> classpath-doc will contain the API docs for classpath in the future.
> They are not in there because of a bug in kaffe using too much memory
> when running gjdoc. This does not happen with gcj-4.0 but this is not in
> unstable yet.
>
I unde
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:47:59AM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 23:31 +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
>
> > Well then, I'll try to go my way using the free alternatives. Eventually
> > I'll send in some feedback if something should not work as expected.
> >
> Hello folks,
>
> Some t
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 23:31 +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
> Well then, I'll try to go my way using the free alternatives. Eventually
> I'll send in some feedback if something should not work as expected.
>
Hello folks,
Some time ago I've asked about "the right Java solution" on Debian platforms.
In t
Well then, I'll try to go my way using the free alternatives. Eventually
I'll send in some feedback if something should not work as expected.
That's the spirit! Thanks.
Daniel
--
The Nice programming language: http://nice.sf.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 20:58 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> The FAQ is really outdated and needs an update.
>
Good to know.
> In general simple Swing apps work already, some more complex widgets
> dont work correctly yet. It would be nice if people can actually try the
> free alternatives and write
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 07:45:15PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 19:37 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
>
> > Where have you found this rumor ?
> >
> From rom the Debian Java FAQ:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch-debian-java-testing-unstable.html
>
> As written
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 12:40 -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> What does 100% in Java mean? You can't use any native code or you can't
> use any Java libraries which contain native code?
>
I'm looking for a free Java SDK, maybe with SWT or SWING support.
That's it.
> The state of free Swing isn't very
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 19:37 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> Where have you found this rumor ?
>
From rom the Debian Java FAQ:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch-debian-java-testing-unstable.html
As written overe there: "free-java-sdk A free Java SDK (compiled from
DSFG compliant J
13 matches
Mail list logo
