Re: [RFS] eclipselink

2021-01-28 Thread tony mancill
Hi Pierre, I reviewed the diff, built the package, and build the r-deps (libspring-java) with ratt. Thank you for the bug fix. DM rights granted. Cheers, tony On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:15:55PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote: > Hello, > > I have updated the package eclipselink, which FTBFS due to

Re: RFS: eclipselink 2.5.1-1 (updated package)

2013-11-04 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-10-27 23:22, Andrew Ross wrote: > Dear Debian Java Team members, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package eclipselink. > This is a dependency of the latest version of Netbeans. > > The changelog is as follows: > > eclipselink (2.5.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * Ne

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new upstream release)

2010-07-11 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Miguel, On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > This is just a new upstream release for EclipseLink. > I tried to include this new upstream release with the fix > for the RC bug #588271 but Damien beat me on that one. :) uploaded to 7 days DELAYED to allow testing migration o

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new upstream release)

2010-07-09 Thread Miguel Landaeta
I forgot to include the important details: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eclipselink/eclipselink_2.1.0-1.dsc git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/eclipselink.git Cheers, -- Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc secure email with PGP 0x7D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/ "

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

2010-06-08 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Miguel, On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipselink". uploaded. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

2010-06-04 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2010-06-04 18:01, Torsten Werner wrote: > Am 04.06.2010 17:34, schrieb Miguel Landaeta: >> By now, IMHO a library only version is useful, since some components of the >> Spring Framework 3.0 link with EclipseLink. > > ... and some of its dependencies are useful without eclipse. Thanks for > pac

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

2010-06-04 Thread Torsten Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 04.06.2010 17:34, schrieb Miguel Landaeta: > By now, IMHO a library only version is useful, since some components of the > Spring Framework 3.0 link with EclipseLink. ... and some of its dependencies are useful without eclipse. Thanks for packaging

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

2010-06-04 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi Hi Niels, > > The changelog on git and on mentors differ (the former still have > "UNRELEASED") - you may want to have the same release both on git and on > mentors, since some sponsors checkout the git rather than using mentors. They differ because mentors reject uploa

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

2010-06-04 Thread Niels Thykier
Miguel Landaeta wrote: > Hi team, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipselink". > > * Package name: eclipselink > Version : 2.0.2-1 > Upstream Author : Oracle, Sun Microsystems Inc. and others > * URL : http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/ > * License

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

2010-06-04 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Le 4/06/10 04:23, Miguel Landaeta a écrit : > Hi team, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipselink". > > * Package name: eclipselink > Version : 2.0.2-1 Great to see eclipselink coming to the archive! Thanks; -- Arnaud Vandyck Proverbe Islandais: Ils volcans les a