Re: [GSoC] Status Reoprt: Java Project Dependency Builder

Hey Emmanuel, I suppose that is partly my fault. I've been trying to tackle the low hanging fruit first which when put together will become the project. My emails are probably a little lower level than they should be. And I don't think I've done a good job describing the why or inputs and outputs

Re: [GSoC] Status Reoprt: Java Project Dependency Builder

Hi Andrew, I'm reading your mails but I have a hard time understanding what you are trying to achieve and how this could help the packaging of Java applications. Assuming your tool is complete, do you have some examples showing how it would be used? Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Re: [GSoC] Status Reoprt: Java Project Dependency Builder

On 10/06/14 19:20, Andrew Schurman wrote: > > > On Monday, June 9, 2014, Daniel Pocock > wrote: >> >> >> On 09/06/14 11:16, Andrew Schurman wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Daniel Pocock > wrote: On 07/06/14 09

Re: [GSoC] Status Reoprt: Java Project Dependency Builder

On Monday, June 9, 2014, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 09/06/14 11:16, Andrew Schurman wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 07/06/14 09:33, Andrew Schurman wrote: > >>> >>> For some projects you will need to patch their pom file or build.xml or >>> whateve

Re: [GSoC] Status Reoprt: Java Project Dependency Builder

Daniel Pocock writes: > On 09/06/14 12:54, Matthew Vernon wrote: > > Would there be value in checking of dependencies that are already > > packages in Debian, and/or aiming to include more of the > > more-commonly-used java libs in the distribution? > > > If Debian-packaged JARs are visible to M

Re: [GSoC] Status Reoprt: Java Project Dependency Builder

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Daniel Pocock writes: > >> On 07/06/14 09:33, Andrew Schurman wrote: >> > I recall reading that packaging a maven project for debian requires >> > maven to be in offline mode during the build. I can try to emulate >> > that by dumping artifa

Re: [GSoC] Status Reoprt: Java Project Dependency Builder

On 09/06/14 12:54, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Daniel Pocock writes: > >> On 07/06/14 09:33, Andrew Schurman wrote: >>> I recall reading that packaging a maven project for debian requires >>> maven to be in offline mode during the build. I can try to emulate >>> that by dumping artifacts into a bui

Re: [GSoC] Status Reoprt: Java Project Dependency Builder

Daniel Pocock writes: > On 07/06/14 09:33, Andrew Schurman wrote: > > I recall reading that packaging a maven project for debian requires > > maven to be in offline mode during the build. I can try to emulate > > that by dumping artifacts into a built artifact repository and use > > that as the o

Re: [GSoC] Status Reoprt: Java Project Dependency Builder

On 09/06/14 11:16, Andrew Schurman wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> >> On 07/06/14 09:33, Andrew Schurman wrote: >> >> For some projects you will need to patch their pom file or build.xml or >> whatever and it would be ideal if you forked their Git repository

Re: [GSoC] Status Reoprt: Java Project Dependency Builder

On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 07/06/14 09:33, Andrew Schurman wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> Last week I was able to fetch source of artifacts which has an >> tag in their maven metadata. By leveraging the maven-scm-plugin, I was >> able to get the vast support of VCSs

Re: [GSoC] Status Reoprt: Java Project Dependency Builder

On 07/06/14 09:33, Andrew Schurman wrote: > Hey guys, > > Last week I was able to fetch source of artifacts which has an > tag in their maven metadata. By leveraging the maven-scm-plugin, I was > able to get the vast support of VCSs for free. It also provides a well > documented interface for e