Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Well, I've several small (only a few classes) libraries with different
> purposes. I didn't think it was worth a separate source package for
> each, therefore there isn't really an overall purpose for the library as
> a whole. The _binary_ packages do have more appropriate
On Wed May 30 00:00, Paul Cager wrote:
> 1) There was recently a mass rebuild of the Debian archive to check
> that packages did not leave cruft behind after a "clean". This involved
> calling "debuild" twice. It looks as though your package would fail this
> test (as did one of mine, bug #424089
On Tue May 29 16:44, Paul Cager wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 2:32 pm, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > Hi, I'm looking for sponsors for various packages, but none of the DDs I
> > know are happy about uploading Java packages. So, is there anyone on
> > this list who could review and upload some Java pac
On Tue, May 29, 2007 2:32 pm, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Hi, I'm looking for sponsors for various packages, but none of the DDs I
> know are happy about uploading Java packages. So, is there anyone on
> this list who could review and upload some Java packages for me.
> [...]
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
Hi, I'm looking for sponsors for various packages, but none of the DDs I
know are happy about uploading Java packages. So, is there anyone on
this list who could review and upload some Java packages for me.
The packages I have to be sponsored are summarised at
http://mjj29.matthew.ath.cx/debian-up
5 matches
Mail list logo
