On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:17:13PM +0200, ?ubo? Ko??o wrote:
> Sorry Michael, my fault, wrong word.
>
> I meant recompiling rather than rebuilding. Opengrok has generics and other
> stuff, whether gcj is more like 1.4.2 . So a lot of refactoring would be
> involved.
>
> Building against gcj is ea
Sorry Michael, my fault, wrong word.
I meant recompiling rather than rebuilding. Opengrok has generics and other
stuff, whether gcj is more like 1.4.2 . So a lot of refactoring would be
involved.
Building against gcj is easy as you say, unless your sources are somewhere
else already ;)
sorry, s
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 05:54:01PM +0200, ?ubo? Ko??o wrote:
> Well,
> let's say I am sure ;)
> (Assumptions are evil ... they really are! )
>
> Opengrok - it's a jar, which you need to call for creation of indexes and
> there is also a swing search application there and naturally there is this
>
Well,
let's say I am sure ;)
(Assumptions are evil ... they really are! )
Opengrok - it's a jar, which you need to call for creation of indexes and
there is also a swing search application there and naturally there is this
famous webapp which is used for src.opensolaris.org/source and many others
Ľuboš Koščo wrote:
Hey, good stuff Seo
Unfortunately opengrok depends on sun-java-jdk , which is in non-free.
As soon as java will be in main, I'd gladly refresh the package :)
Are you sure it depends on Sun's JDK or are you just assuming? AFAIK it
is just a normal WAR and should be easy to
Matt, Eric, Michael
thank you, will do & change the category to contrib/misc
Lubos
On 6/27/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:40:32PM +0200, ?ubo? Ko??o wrote:
> Since I am a packaging newbie, can you please elaborate more on why
should
> it be in contrib ?
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:40:32PM +0200, ?ubo? Ko??o wrote:
> Since I am a packaging newbie, can you please elaborate more on why should
> it be in contrib ? Is this in some policy I haven't read ? (probably yes) ;)
> ?
>
> ( http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/sun-java5-jdk is non-free )
>
Hi,
¥ubo¹ Ko¹èo said:
> Since I am a packaging newbie, can you please elaborate more on why should
> it be in contrib ? Is this in some policy I haven't read ? (probably yes)
> ;)
> ?
Rule is very simple:
- if package is free and depends only on packages in main, it's also main.
- if package is fr
On Wed Jun 27 12:40, Ľuboš Koščo wrote:
> Since I am a packaging newbie, can you please elaborate more on why should
> it be in contrib ? Is this in some policy I haven't read ? (probably yes) ;)
Yes, the Debian Policy[0]. Specifically the section about archive
categories[1]. This gives as an exam
Since I am a packaging newbie, can you please elaborate more on why should
it be in contrib ? Is this in some policy I haven't read ? (probably yes) ;)
?
( http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/sun-java5-jdk is non-free )
Anyways I will try to repackage it into contrib (funny that I had it in
On Wed Jun 27 12:19, Ľuboš Koščo wrote:
> Hey, good stuff Seo
>
> Unfortunately opengrok depends on sun-java-jdk , which is in non-free. As
> soon as java will be in main, I'd gladly refresh the package :)
In which case it should be in contrib.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description
Hey, good stuff Seo
Unfortunately opengrok depends on sun-java-jdk , which is in non-free. As
soon as java will be in main, I'd gladly refresh the package :)
thnx for the note!
Lubos
On 6/26/07, Sanghyeon Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/6/26, Ľuboš Koščo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dear mentor
2007/6/26, Ľuboš Koščo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opengrok".
* License : CDDL
Section : non-free/misc
Why is CDDL non-free? Doesn't CDDL meet DFSG? (Also, as often
mentioned, star package is in main and exclusively licensed under
CDDL.)
--
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opengrok".
* Package name: opengrok
Version : 0.4-1
Upstream Author : Chandan B.N, Trond Norbye, Knut Pape, Martin
Englund, Sun Microsystems
* URL : http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/opengrok
* License
14 matches
Mail list logo
