Re: RFS: libxmltooling-java - [UPLOADED]

2014-08-20 Thread tony mancill
On 08/19/2014 02:48 AM, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Stephen Nelson writes: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libxmltooling-java" >> >> It builds those binary packages: >> >> - libxmltooling-java - XMLTooling-J >> - libxmltooling-java-doc - Documentation for XMLTooling-J >> >> The upl

Re: RFS: libxmltooling-java

2014-08-19 Thread tony
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:48:34AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Stephen Nelson writes: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libxmltooling-java" > > > > It builds those binary packages: > > > > - libxmltooling-java - XMLTooling-J > > - libxmltooling-java-doc - Documentation for

Re: RFS: libxmltooling-java

2014-08-19 Thread Matthew Vernon
Stephen Nelson writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libxmltooling-java" > > It builds those binary packages: > > - libxmltooling-java - XMLTooling-J > - libxmltooling-java-doc - Documentation for XMLTooling-J > > The upload is to fix an RC bug #752963 where the package FTBFS

Re: RFS: libxmltooling-java

2014-07-31 Thread Stephen Nelson
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Hi, > > Firstly, thanks for fixing this bug; I obviously missed it arriving somehow. > Hi Matthew, No worries - just trying to help with resolving a defect. This one seemed at parity with my Debian packaging skill level! > > On 30/07/14

Re: RFS: libxmltooling-java

2014-07-30 Thread Matthew Vernon
Hi, Firstly, thanks for fixing this bug; I obviously missed it arriving somehow. On 30/07/14 21:21, Stephen Nelson wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: On 30/07/2014 19:04, Stephen Nelson wrote: Usually, it is better to send the patch in the bug itself and if there

Re: RFS: libxmltooling-java

2014-07-30 Thread Stephen Nelson
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > On 30/07/2014 19:04, Stephen Nelson wrote: > > Usually, it is better to send the patch in the bug itself and if there > is no activity for a few days (on RC bugs), > you can ask for a sponsor on the mailing list. > However, since the bug is

Re: RFS: libxmltooling-java

2014-07-30 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 30/07/2014 19:04, Stephen Nelson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On 30/07/2014 18:46, Stephen Nelson wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libxmltooling-java" >> Did you check with Matthew before? >>> It builds those

Re: RFS: libxmltooling-java

2014-07-30 Thread Stephen Nelson
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Hello, > > On 30/07/2014 18:46, Stephen Nelson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libxmltooling-java" > Did you check with Matthew before? >> It builds those binary packages: >> >> - libxmltooling-java - XMLToo

Re: RFS: libxmltooling-java

2014-07-30 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, On 30/07/2014 18:46, Stephen Nelson wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libxmltooling-java" Did you check with Matthew before? > It builds those binary packages: > > - libxmltooling-java - XMLTooling-J I think this description should be improved. XMLTooling-J does

RFS: libxmltooling-java

2014-07-30 Thread Stephen Nelson
Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libxmltooling-java" It builds those binary packages: - libxmltooling-java - XMLTooling-J - libxmltooling-java-doc - Documentation for XMLTooling-J The upload is to fix an RC bug #752963 where the package FTBFS. I added a missing build dependency