Le 06/04/2015 16:15, tony mancill a écrit :
> I'm wondering it would be less confusing/overall work if we go ahead and
> ship an empty jffi-native.jar in /usj + maven artifacts in the
> libjffi-java (arch:all) package, which in turn depends on the -jni package.
>
> Or put another way, do folks th
On 04/06/2015 05:33 AM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
> On 6 Apr 2015, at 7:26 pm, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>
>> Le 06/04/2015 11:11, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) a écrit :
>>
>>> Path to dependency:
>>> 1) com.github.jnr:jnr-ffi:jar:1.0.10
>>> 2) com.github.jnr:jffi:jar:native:1.2.7
On 6 Apr 2015, at 7:26 pm, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 06/04/2015 11:11, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) a écrit :
>
>> Path to dependency:
>> 1) com.github.jnr:jnr-ffi:jar:1.0.10
>> 2) com.github.jnr:jffi:jar:native:1.2.7
>>
>> Is there some magic required to get Maven to look in
>>
Le 06/04/2015 11:11, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) a écrit :
> Path to dependency:
> 1) com.github.jnr:jnr-ffi:jar:1.0.10
> 2) com.github.jnr:jffi:jar:native:1.2.7
>
> Is there some magic required to get Maven to look in
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/jni (or wherever) for the native
On 5 Apr 2015, at 4:47 pm, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services)
wrote:
>
> On 5 Apr 2015, at 12:44 am, tony mancill wrote:
>>
>> The fact that 1.0.2-11 had shipped a JAR in /usr/lib/jni/ had me
>> confused, but as Emmanuel pointed out, this needs to be multi-arch aware.
>>
>> Tim, do you have a (sim
On 5 Apr 2015, at 12:44 am, tony mancill wrote:
>
> The fact that 1.0.2-11 had shipped a JAR in /usr/lib/jni/ had me
> confused, but as Emmanuel pointed out, this needs to be multi-arch aware.
>
> Tim, do you have a (simple?) run-time test I can use to validate the
> package after moving the co
On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 15:38:48 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
>
> The upload of 1.2.7-2 to experimental gets rid of jffi-native.jar and
> installs the .so into /usr/lib/$(multi-arch-triplet)/jni.
>
> What I don't have is a good reverse dependencies test (jruby doesn't
> look like it's ready yet - please
> Le 04/04/2015 05:22, tony mancill a écrit :
>
>> The current packaging creates a
>> libjffi-jni binary package that installs an arch:any file under /usj.
>> That's going to break on multi-arch systems because it won't be possible
>> to co-install libjffi-jni:amd64 and libjffi-jni:i386, etc. on t
On 04/04/2015 04:46 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 04/04/2015 05:22 AM, tony mancill wrote:
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> the jffi update looks pretty good, lots of great work, but I have a
>> question about the -jni package. The current packaging creates a
>> libjffi-jni binary package that installs an arch:a
Le 04/04/2015 05:22, tony mancill a écrit :
> The current packaging creates a
> libjffi-jni binary package that installs an arch:any file under /usj.
> That's going to break on multi-arch systems because it won't be possible
> to co-install libjffi-jni:amd64 and libjffi-jni:i386, etc. on the same
On 04/04/2015 05:22 AM, tony mancill wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> the jffi update looks pretty good, lots of great work, but I have a
> question about the -jni package. The current packaging creates a
> libjffi-jni binary package that installs an arch:any file under /usj.
> That's going to break on multi
Hi Tim,
the jffi update looks pretty good, lots of great work, but I have a
question about the -jni package. The current packaging creates a
libjffi-jni binary package that installs an arch:any file under /usj.
That's going to break on multi-arch systems because it won't be possible
to co-install
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 09:30:54PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
>
> Hi Miguel, hi Tim -
>
> Miguel, let's divide and conquer. I'll take a look at jffi and you can
> focus on jenkins.
Hi Tony,
Great, let's do that.
Cheers,
--
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
secure email with PGP 0x6E60
On 03/31/2015 05:54 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:42:01PM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
>> On 30 Mar 2015, at 8:17 pm, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 30/03/2015 11:01, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) a écrit :
>>>
Excellent point about unstable - what wou
On 1 Apr 2015, at 11:54 am, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:42:01PM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
>> On 30 Mar 2015, at 8:17 pm, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 30/03/2015 11:01, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) a écrit :
>>>
Excellent point about unstable - w
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:42:01PM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2015, at 8:17 pm, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >
> > Le 30/03/2015 11:01, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) a écrit :
> >
> >> Excellent point about unstable - what would you think about uploading to
> >> experiment
On 30 Mar 2015, at 8:17 pm, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 30/03/2015 11:01, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) a écrit :
>
>> Excellent point about unstable - what would you think about uploading to
>> experimental instead?
>
> Uploading to experimental should be fine.
OK that sounds like the way to
On 30 Mar 2015, at 8:17 pm, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 30/03/2015 11:01, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) a écrit :
>
>> Excellent point about unstable - what would you think about uploading to
>> experimental instead?
>
> Uploading to experimental should be fine.
OK I’ve changed the distort to
On 30 Mar 2015, at 7:37 pm, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 30/03/2015 08:23, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) a écrit :
>> On 9 Mar 2015, at 11:21 am, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone. I’m back in action again and keen to get jiffi and the other
>> jnr-* modules uploaded to the archive. I’
Le 30/03/2015 11:01, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) a écrit :
> Excellent point about unstable - what would you think about uploading to
> experimental instead?
Uploading to experimental should be fine.
> It would be sad to have to remove Jenkins from Jessie but I think you’re
> right. One of
Le 30/03/2015 08:23, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) a écrit :
> On 9 Mar 2015, at 11:21 am, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>
> Hi everyone. I’m back in action again and keen to get jiffi and the other
> jnr-* modules uploaded to the archive. I’ve made a small patch to the
> jenkins maven.rules file (an
On 9 Mar 2015, at 11:21 am, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:45:44AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
>>
>> Done. Just doing a rebuild of the package now.
>>
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Any news on jffi?
Hi everyone. I’m back in action again and keen to get jiffi and the
22 matches
Mail list logo
