Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg2-1 [RC] - [UPLOADED]

2014-03-16 Thread tony mancill
On 03/16/2014 01:25 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > *bump* > > > On 19.02.2014 16:53, Markus Koschany wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have prepared a new release for freemind which is currently affected >> by bug #736105 and I am looking for a sponsor to upload it. > > I'm still looking for a sponsor for

Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg2-1 [RC]

2014-03-16 Thread Markus Koschany
*bump* On 19.02.2014 16:53, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi all, > > I have prepared a new release for freemind which is currently affected > by bug #736105 and I am looking for a sponsor to upload it. I'm still looking for a sponsor for freemind which got removed from testing due to bug #736105. N

Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg2-1 [RC]

2014-02-21 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello Paul, On 21.02.2014 03:10, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> Gnash is able to handle that too. > > You've tested that gnash works with this particular Flash program? Yeah, sure I did. >> However I have no preferences for flash > > As the ma

Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg2-1 [RC]

2014-02-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > Gnash is able to handle that too. You've tested that gnash works with this particular Flash program? > However I have no preferences for flash As the maintainer of mtasc in Debian my preference is for Flash to die. mtasc is dead upstrea

Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg2-1 [RC]

2014-02-20 Thread Markus Koschany
On Thu, 20. Feb 08:54 Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > I downloaded the missing sources from upstream's git repository and > > created an extra source tarball, so that freemind consists of two > > different source tarballs now. I simply removed the

Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg2-1 [RC]

2014-02-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > I downloaded the missing sources from upstream's git repository and > created an extra source tarball, so that freemind consists of two > different source tarballs now. I simply removed the old flash file from > the old tarball. The flash

Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg2-1 [RC]

2014-02-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi Felix, On 19.02.2014 20:59, Felix Natter wrote: > Markus Koschany writes: [...] > I will soon package Freeplane's flash browser (which is almost the same > as FreeMind's flash browser) for Debian, and I wonder about the license > (what to put in debian/copyright)? > > Is it: > > Copyright: 2

Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg2-1 [RC]

2014-02-19 Thread Felix Natter
Markus Koschany writes: > Hi all, hi Markus, > I have prepared a new release for freemind which is currently affected > by bug #736105 and I am looking for a sponsor to upload it. > > I downloaded the missing sources from upstream's git repository and > created an extra source tarball, so that

RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg2-1 [RC]

2014-02-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi all, I have prepared a new release for freemind which is currently affected by bug #736105 and I am looking for a sponsor to upload it. I downloaded the missing sources from upstream's git repository and created an extra source tarball, so that freemind consists of two different source tarball