Re: RFC: libinieditor-java

2005-11-11 Thread Aldous D. Penaranda
On 11/10/05, Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (1) > Architecture: any > > Java packages are Architecture: all ! This change will also mean to > use Build-Depends-Indep and to move the build stuff into the > binary-indep: target in the debian/rules file. Done. > (2) > Depends: gij | kaff

Re: RFC: libinieditor-java

2005-11-10 Thread Wolfgang Baer
Michael Koch wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:13:01AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: [...] (2) Depends: gij | kaffe | sablevm | java1-runtime | java2-runtime IMHO its enough to depend on one concrete java1-runtime and most packages in debian use kaffe there (but thats a personal viewpoint) Depe

Re: RFC: libinieditor-java

2005-11-10 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:13:01AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > Hi Aldous, > > Aldous D. Penaranda wrote: > >Hello, > [...] > >I was wondering if anyone else would have time to look at it and give > >some comments. If the packaging seems okay, I would also like to ask > >for a sponsor if anyone w

Re: RFC: libinieditor-java

2005-11-10 Thread Wolfgang Baer
Hi Aldous, Aldous D. Penaranda wrote: Hello, [...] I was wondering if anyone else would have time to look at it and give some comments. If the packaging seems okay, I would also like to ask for a sponsor if anyone would be willing. (1) Architecture: any Java packages are Architecture: all !

RFC: libinieditor-java

2005-11-08 Thread Aldous D. Penaranda
Hello, I've packaged libinieditor-java, a small library for manipulating ini-style configuration files. The debianized package is at http://deathwing.penarmac.com/debian/libinieditor-java/ and I've asked at #debian-mentors for some comments on my package. rafl (Florian Ragwitz) said that based on