additions to java-policy (was: Bug#201670: RFA: java-common -- Java policy and FAQ.)

2003-07-17 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Stefan, * Stefan Gybas wrote: [..] >the debian-java list. Just like it's done on debian-policy. Ok. [latest java-policy] >It's the one in java-common 0.21, uploaded today. Thanks, got it just now. I just thought that I heard once about bigger changes... >>BTW, can you post you suggestion

Re: Bug#201670: RFA: java-common -- Java policy and FAQ.

2003-07-17 Thread Stefan Gybas
Jan Schulz wrote: Just a question: Is it ok if a policy package is that openly available for changes? It's not open for changes just because it is co-maintained. The java-common mainitainers just write down the decisions that are made by the debian-java list. Just like it's done on debian-policy.

additions to java-policy (was: Bug#201670: RFA: java-common -- Java policy and FAQ.)

2003-07-17 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Stefan, * Stefan Gybas wrote: [..] >the debian-java list. Just like it's done on debian-policy. Ok. [latest java-policy] >It's the one in java-common 0.21, uploaded today. Thanks, got it just now. I just thought that I heard once about bigger changes... >>BTW, can you post you suggestion

Re: Bug#201670: RFA: java-common -- Java policy and FAQ.

2003-07-17 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo! * Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll take the package and add it to the pkg-java project on Alioth, if > you agree. So you and the other project members can co-maintain it. Just a question: Is it ok if a policy package is that openly available for changes? > I have some sugge

Re: Bug#201670: RFA: java-common -- Java policy and FAQ.

2003-07-17 Thread Stefan Gybas
Jan Schulz wrote: Just a question: Is it ok if a policy package is that openly available for changes? It's not open for changes just because it is co-maintained. The java-common mainitainers just write down the decisions that are made by the debian-java list. Just like it's done on debian-policy

Re: Bug#201670: RFA: java-common -- Java policy and FAQ.

2003-07-17 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo! * Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll take the package and add it to the pkg-java project on Alioth, if > you agree. So you and the other project members can co-maintain it. Just a question: Is it ok if a policy package is that openly available for changes? > I have some sugge

Re: Bug#201670: RFA: java-common -- Java policy and FAQ.

2003-07-17 Thread Stefan Gybas
retitle 201670 ITA: java-common -- Java policy and FAQ. thanks Ola Lundqvist wrote: I have not been very active as the java policy maintainer the past ... year or so. The reason is that I do not use Java as much as I did and my work no longer depends on it. Therefore I would like someone else to ta

RFA: java-common -- Java policy and FAQ.

2003-07-17 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hello I have not been very active as the java policy maintainer the past ... year or so. The reason is that I do not use Java as much as I did and my work no longer depends on it. Therefore I would like someone else to take over the policy work for Java packages. I

Re: Bug#201670: RFA: java-common -- Java policy and FAQ.

2003-07-17 Thread Stefan Gybas
retitle 201670 ITA: java-common -- Java policy and FAQ. thanks Ola Lundqvist wrote: I have not been very active as the java policy maintainer the past ... year or so. The reason is that I do not use Java as much as I did and my work no longer depends on it. Therefore I would like someone else to t

RFA: java-common -- Java policy and FAQ.

2003-07-16 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hello I have not been very active as the java policy maintainer the past ... year or so. The reason is that I do not use Java as much as I did and my work no longer depends on it. Therefore I would like someone else to take over the policy work for Java packages. I