Re: Question regarding libjsyntaxpane-java on alioth

2018-04-28 Thread Felix Natter
Markus Koschany writes: > Hi, > > Am 23.04.2018 um 21:44 schrieb Felix Natter: >> Felix Natter writes: >> >>> hello Debian-java, >> >> hello again, >> >>> when accessing libjsyntaxpane-java I get "Bad object id:" on each commit: >>> https://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/libjsyntaxpa

Re: Question regarding libjsyntaxpane-java on alioth

2018-04-23 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 23.04.2018 um 21:44 schrieb Felix Natter: > Felix Natter writes: > >> hello Debian-java, > > hello again, > >> when accessing libjsyntaxpane-java I get "Bad object id:" on each commit: >> https://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/libjsyntaxpane-java.git > > I tried to clone the r

Re: Question regarding libjsyntaxpane-java on alioth

2018-04-23 Thread Felix Natter
Felix Natter writes: > hello Debian-java, hello again, > when accessing libjsyntaxpane-java I get "Bad object id:" on each commit: > https://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/libjsyntaxpane-java.git I tried to clone the repo and I can make a (local) commit. So I guess just the web interf

Re: Question on java library packaging

2014-07-14 Thread tony mancill
Hi, On 07/14/2014 06:20 PM, Robert Middleton wrote: >>You are right, dbus-java-bin should depend on "default-jre | > java6-runtime | java7-runtime" instead of "openjdk-7-jre | openjdk-6-jre". > > Good to know. :) If Java6 is sufficient, then "default-jre | java6-runtime" should be sufficient. A

Re: Question on java library packaging

2014-07-14 Thread Robert Middleton
>You are right, dbus-java-bin should depend on "default-jre | java6-runtime | java7-runtime" instead of "openjdk-7-jre | openjdk-6-jre". Good to know. :) >This is an error in the policy, thank you for spotting it. Out of curiosity, why does the policy not require that libraries depend on Java?

Re: Question on java library packaging

2014-07-14 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 14/07/2014 16:42, Robert Middleton a écrit : > That implies to me that the dbus-java-bin depending on openjdk-7-jre is > incorrect, and it should actually depend on default-jre. Is it > intentional that it depends on openjdk? You are right, dbus-java-bin should depend on "default-jre | java6-r

Re: question to sun-java6-* and floatingpoint bug

2011-02-10 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, Am 10.02.2011 12:19, schrieb Niels Thykier: > On 2011-02-10 11:31, Jochen Becker wrote: >> Oracle said they will release a new/fixed java version at the 15th feb., >> when will be such a new version in the stable release as security fix? there is already a fix for openjdk available at

Re: question to sun-java6-* and floatingpoint bug

2011-02-10 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-02-10 11:31, Jochen Becker wrote: > Hello Maintainers, > i have a question about this sun-java bug > Hey, Moving this to debian-java@l.d.o to get more exposure. Unfortunately I cannot answer your questions as I am not directly involved wit

Re: Question regarding OpenMRS packaging - JAR dependencies in source?

2010-11-10 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Tue Nov 09 17:06, Misha Koshelev wrote: > Dear All: > > Please pardon my disturbance on your list. No problem, we're always happy to help (-: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote: > > There are a lot of .jar files which contain .class binary objects. > > Are correspondant s

Re: Question concerning patched jars

2008-07-16 Thread Florian Grandel
Hi again, The JPackage people have the following solution: They include the JBoss patches into their source and produce two independent non-conflicting binary packages from the same source package: - one unpatched for general use (that goes into /usr/share/java) and - one for jbossas (which go

Re: Question concerning jh_manifest

2008-07-04 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Fri Jul 04 00:38, Florian Grandel wrote: > The standard ant jar task creates a manifest with an empty line at the end. > If I apply jh_manifest this empty line remains untouched and leads to the > following MANIFEST.MF (jh_manifest added the lines starting with Main-Class > and below): Ah, t

Re: Question concerning jh_manifest

2008-07-03 Thread Florian Grandel
Hi Matthew, I have further researched this problem. To me it seems a (not too trivial) bug in jh_manifest. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489214. Maybe better to discuss the topic there to keep this list clean... Cheers, Florian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

RE: question

2004-10-29 Thread stefano_saitta
>-- Original Message -- >From: debian-java@lists.debian.org >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: question >Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:28:24 +0200 > > >yours? > >Attachment: friend.zip > non conprendo il messaggio rispondi in italiano

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-09-06 Thread Ricky Clarkson
If you have a package, say, erm, myjavaprogram, and it works with the Sun JVM, IBM JVM, Blackdown and kaffe, but not sablevm, then my interpretation is that the dependencies should look like this: java2-runtime | kaffe and that kaffe and sablevm, because they don't support everything that is in J

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-09-05 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z wto, 31-08-2004, godz. 07:59, Ricky Clarkson pisze: > On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:50:54 +0200, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:12:28 -0400, > > "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-09-01 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:04:49 +0200, Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that the new IKVM snapshot (from today) has a new JNI provider > which should be at least good enough to get Eclipse 3 starting up. So it > should now be at least as capable as jamvm, gcj/gij or kaffe with > respect

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-31 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 04:12, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > Not sure it's a good idea. Given that the "java-virtual-machine" > dependency was created to accomodate the properties shared among > the JVMs and that most of JVMs, in general, is capable of running > JNI code, running a JNI code is

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-31 Thread Ricky Clarkson
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:50:54 +0200, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:12:28 -0400, > "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PS: When Sarge is finally released shouldn't we think about renaming > >

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-31 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:12:28 -0400, "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PS: When Sarge is finally released shouldn't we think about renaming > java-runtime to something like free-java-runtime and java2-runtime to > something like non-f

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-30 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z pon, 30-08-2004, godz. 18:16, Arnaud Vandyck pisze: > > Here's the question: should ikvm provide > > java-virtual-machine or not? > > I'd like to say yes. So I second it. First let me welcome next free JVM in Debian! :-) And now to the business... Not sure it's a good idea. Given t

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-30 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:01:59 -0500, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, Hi, > I have just uploaded ikvm to incoming. Great! good news! ;-) (I installed it) [...] > it cannot handle classes/jars that link in native code. Is it on the

Re: question about tomcat

2004-01-21 Thread Stefan Gybas
Michael Forster wrote: IIRC the problem is, that the links are regenerated when the package is updated. They are not regenerated if at least one link is not deleted (or an S link is replaced by a K link). Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: question about tomcat

2004-01-21 Thread Stefan Gybas
Mariano García wrote: I want to ask you if there is any way to get tomcat does not start automatically when linux starts. Yes, you can set TOMCAT4_USER to an empty string in /etc/default/tomcat4. However, you won't be able to manually run /etc/init.d/tomcat4 in this case either. There has been

Re: question about tomcat

2004-01-20 Thread Daniel Bonniot
I want to ask you if there is any way to get tomcat does not start automatically when linux starts. I know I can delete all /etc/rcx.d/S20tomcat4 links, but, there is another way? (as editing parameter start_at_boot in /etc/tomcat/default, for example). use the command "update-rc.d" to properly

RE: question about tomcat

2004-01-20 Thread Michael Forster
Hi, Xavier Poinsard wrote: > Mariano García wrote: > > I want to ask you if there is any way to get tomcat does not start > > automatically when linux starts. I know I can delete all > > /etc/rcx.d/S20tomcat4 links, but, there is another way? (as editing > > parameter start_at_boot in /etc/tomcat

Re: question about tomcat

2004-01-20 Thread Xavier Poinsard
Mariano García wrote: Hi all, I want to ask you if there is any way to get tomcat does not start automatically when linux starts. I know I can delete all /etc/rcx.d/S20tomcat4 links, but, there is another way? (as editing parameter start_at_boot in /etc/tomcat/default, for example). use the comman

Re: Question about Update site behaviour

1999-11-17 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously John Foster wrote: > I have been working on a new installation today and to my dismay the > sources.list file that I have been using for months, is suddenly doing > strange things. I have made no adjustments to it but when I ran apt-get > update and dselect update I got hits on all the s