Do NOT use debian/control.in (was: Re: apache xml-rpc)

Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:18:57 +0200, Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, the debian/control.in feature of cdbs should not be used as we have > heard yesterday: > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/2005-April/003273.html My fault! Sorry. -- .''`. : :' :rn

Re: apache xml-rpc

Martin Ferrari - DECIDIR Argentina wrote: Hi Wolfgang! I am not a DD so I cannot sponsor your package. However I had a look at it and some questions/comments: Let's see.. - Why don't you package the 2.0 release. Are you dependent on the old release (its from 2003) and is it still maintained ?

Re: apache xml-rpc

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:54:40 -0300, Martin Ferrari - DECIDIR Argentina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - You have xercesImpl.jar in your DEB_JARS variable but not >>libxerces2-java as build depends. > > it is a dependency of libant1.6-java, should I specify it nevertheless? No. But then it shoul

RE: apache xml-rpc

Hi Wolfgang! > I am not a DD so I cannot sponsor your package. > > However I had a look at it and some questions/comments: Let's see.. > - Why don't you package the 2.0 release. Are you dependent on the >old release (its from 2003) and is it still maintained ? Well, the developers don't hav

RE: apache xml-rpc

Arnaud, Now I'm checking the issues pointed by Wolfgang. I've already searched wnpp and then filed my ITP (#303405). Thanks! > Hi Wolfgang, Hi Martin, > > Martin, when it'll be corrected, contact me in private, I'll try to > review it and upload it. > > Was there an ITP against wnpp (http://b

Re: apache xml-rpc

Hi Wolfgang, Hi Martin, Martin, when it'll be corrected, contact me in private, I'll try to review it and upload it. Was there an ITP against wnpp (http://bugs.debian.org/wnpp and search xmlrpc or something)? Wolfgang, thanks for your help in reviewing the package. Cheers, Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:

Re: apache xml-rpc

Martin Ferrari wrote: Anyone? Should I try debian-mentors list? Hi Martin, I am not a DD so I cannot sponsor your package. However I had a look at it and some questions/comments: - Why don't you package the 2.0 release. Are you dependent on the old release (its from 2003) and is it still maintain

RE: apache xml-rpc

test > version) > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Martin Ferrari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Viernes, 01 de Abril de 2005 10:19 a.m. > > To: debian-java@lists.debian.org > > Subject: Re: apache xml-rpc > > > > > > Yup, I wa

RE: apache xml-rpc

@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: apache xml-rpc > > > Yup, I was referring to that project... > > The apache mod doesn't fit here because the application is written in > java, not C... > > I will try to package it today, but I'm no DD, so If anyone could >

Re: apache xml-rpc

Yup, I was referring to that project... The apache mod doesn't fit here because the application is written in java, not C... I will try to package it today, but I'm no DD, so If anyone could sponsor it I will be grateful... On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 20:48 +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote: > Adam M., I th

Re: apache xml-rpc

Adam M., I think Martin Ferrari is talking about this: http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/ Remember, this is debian-java, and libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2 doesn't have much to do with Java... Seo Sanghyeon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI

Re: apache xml-rpc

Martin Ferrari - DECIDIR Argentina wrote: > I would want to know if there is currently somebody packaging said > library. If it isn't I should have to package it myself... You mean something like, Package: libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2 Priority: optional Section: web Installed-Size: 136 Maintainer: An