Hi Hideki,
Le 08/10/2023 à 05:25, Hideki Yamane a écrit :
Thank you, and how about adding java_compat_level=8 for Java21?
Since some FTBFS reports are there.
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/java-common/-/merge_requests/3
java_compat_level=8 is supported in java-common/0.75+exp1 in
e
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 01:26:11 +0200
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I've just uploaded java-common/0.75 with a new java_compat_level
> variable if you want to give it a try:
>
>#!/usr/bin/make -f
>
>include /usr/share/java/java_defaults.mk
>
>build:
>javac -source $(java_co
Le 05/10/2023 à 01:07, Hideki Yamane a écrit :
We should probably provide the minimum language level supported as a
variable in the /usr/share/java/java_defaults.mk file from java-common.
Nice, each Java packages do not need to care about which level
should use and drop it safely, then?
Hi,
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:49:44 +0200
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> We should probably provide the minimum language level supported as a
> variable in the /usr/share/java/java_defaults.mk file from java-common.
Nice, each Java packages do not need to care about which level
should use and drop it sa
Le 04/10/2023 à 13:36, Hideki Yamane a écrit :
Well, is there any text / document to use which version should be
used for -source and -target version, or is just dropping those options
allowed?
For Java 17 the minimum was 7, and with Java 21 the minimum is 8. For
packages using ant, Mav
Hi,
Some of Java packages are FTBFS with Java21 due to javac -source and -target
version is lower than that is supported in Java21.
Well, is there any text / document to use which version should be
used for -source and -target version, or is just dropgping those options
allowed?
Maybe I a
6 matches
Mail list logo
