Bug#103420: marked as done (Proposed addition to java-common)

2004-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Proposed addition to java-common Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 21:34:49 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2.9] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: java-common S

Re: Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-27 Thread Andrew Pimlott
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 06:58:12AM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > > Oh. (Sheepishly looking in the archives for your script and > > otherwise nosing around.) Well now, I'm not sure I see who is > > helped by your script (in its current form). > > Well, the idea is that *every* java interpreter or

Re: Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-27 Thread Ben Burton
> Oh. (Sheepishly looking in the archives for your script and > otherwise nosing around.) Well now, I'm not sure I see who is > helped by your script (in its current form). Well, the idea is that *every* java interpreter or compiler packaged by Debian gets placed in these scripts. Thus the app

Re: Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-27 Thread Andrew Pimlott
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 06:58:12AM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > > Oh. (Sheepishly looking in the archives for your script and > > otherwise nosing around.) Well now, I'm not sure I see who is > > helped by your script (in its current form). > > Well, the idea is that *every* java interpreter o

Re: Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-27 Thread Ben Burton
> Oh. (Sheepishly looking in the archives for your script and > otherwise nosing around.) Well now, I'm not sure I see who is > helped by your script (in its current form). Well, the idea is that *every* java interpreter or compiler packaged by Debian gets placed in these scripts. Thus the ap

Re: Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-27 Thread Andrew Pimlott
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:45:06AM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > Andrew Pimlott wrote: > > > Your script punishes the Debian developer who creates a clean > > package for a new JVM, that registers an alternative for > > /usr/bin/java and runs without any special help. Users should be > > able to ins

Re: Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-26 Thread Andrew Pimlott
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:45:06AM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > Andrew Pimlott wrote: > > > Your script punishes the Debian developer who creates a clean > > package for a new JVM, that registers an alternative for > > /usr/bin/java and runs without any special help. Users should be > > able to in

Re: Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-25 Thread Ben Burton
I understand your point and I agree that JVMs should work out of the box, but as it is now, they don't. Your argument is well made and IMHO we should file bugs against existing JVMs that exhibit non-preferred behaviour. However, in the meantime - as someone who packages a Java *program* - I find

Re: Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-24 Thread Ben Burton
I understand your point and I agree that JVMs should work out of the box, but as it is now, they don't. Your argument is well made and IMHO we should file bugs against existing JVMs that exhibit non-preferred behaviour. However, in the meantime - as someone who packages a Java *program* - I fin

Re: Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-24 Thread Andrew Pimlott
[ Answering old mail. ] On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 09:34:49PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > Hi. Policy states that Java programs must run without specific environment > variables, which can be some hassle when writing a program that works with > several JVMs. Different JVMs use different bootstrap c

Re: Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-24 Thread Andrew Pimlott
[ Answering old mail. ] On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 09:34:49PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > Hi. Policy states that Java programs must run without specific environment > variables, which can be some hassle when writing a program that works with > several JVMs. Different JVMs use different bootstrap

Re: Bug#103420: Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-04 Thread Ben Burton
> Interresting. I can add it if you send me the manpage for find_java and > find_javac (and find jar?) and also the scripts (in a tar archive). I've uploaded the tools: http://people.debian.org/~bab/findjava/ There's findjava, findjavac, findjar, man pages and a tarball containing everything.

Re: Bug#103420: Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-04 Thread Ben Burton
> Interresting. I can add it if you send me the manpage for find_java and > find_javac (and find jar?) and also the scripts (in a tar archive). I've uploaded the tools: http://people.debian.org/~bab/findjava/ There's findjava, findjavac, findjar, man pages and a tarball containing everything.

Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-03 Thread Ben Burton
Package: java-common Severity: wishlist Hi. Policy states that Java programs must run without specific environment variables, which can be some hassle when writing a program that works with several JVMs. Different JVMs use different bootstrap classes - which sometimes need to be passed on th

Proposed addition to java-common

2001-07-03 Thread Ben Burton
Package: java-common Severity: wishlist Hi. Policy states that Java programs must run without specific environment variables, which can be some hassle when writing a program that works with several JVMs. Different JVMs use different bootstrap classes - which sometimes need to be passed on t