Hi,
On Mittwoch, 8. April 2015, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * There are several jenkins-* packages that will (presumably) need to
>be updated as often as Jenkins itself.
I wondered which packages were "jenkins*" and figured it out with the help
from Adam:
holger@coccia:~$ dak rm -Rn jenkins
Wil
Le 09/04/2015 10:10, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit :
> Of course this only works as long as no new dependencies are pulled in,
> or at least stay at something managable.
Jenkins upgrades have been accompanied by new dependencies in the past,
the upstream developers often refactor the code and split so
On 2015-04-09 9:10, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
[...]
So it looks to me like we currently miss a place to offer a package
like
Jenkins to stable users, but it would be nice to have one as I believe
there will be more packages in this situation in the future (even
though
we might not like this).
I
Hi,
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 23:33 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2015-04-08 22:45, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>> > Do you think is feasible or acceptable to maintain Jenkins in
>> > jessie-updates suite instead?
>>
>> I am not entirely convinced that Jenkins applies to s
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 23:33 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-04-08 22:45, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:17:59 +0200, Niels Thykier escribió:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC.
> >> We concluded that it was infeasibl
On 2015-04-08 22:45, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:17:59 +0200, Niels Thykier escribió:
>> [...]
>>
>> I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC.
>> We concluded that it was infeasible for Debian to maintain Jenkins due
>> to the lack of upstream comm
6 matches
Mail list logo
