Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 12:05 PM Olek Wojnar wrote: > Update: I see that a new version of OpenJDK 11 is currently building for > mips64el. Does this new version address the directory deletion issue? > > If so, then yay and thanks. If not, I'll go ahead and just report a bug > against the Debian p

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

Update: I see that a new version of OpenJDK 11 is currently building for mips64el. Does this new version address the directory deletion issue? If so, then yay and thanks. If not, I'll go ahead and just report a bug against the Debian package so it's easier to track. I'm thinking Severity Important

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

Thanks for the ideas so far! On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 3:53 AM Ao Qi wrote: > I tried to dpkg-buildpackage bazel-bootstrap, but I failed to > reproduce the issue. It seems a long time is needed. Is there a > simpler way to reproduce the problem? > When you say that you failed to reproduce the iss

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

I tried to dpkg-buildpackage bazel-bootstrap, but I failed to reproduce the issue. It seems a long time is needed. Is there a simpler way to reproduce the problem? Just FYI, we had a workaround for another issue. I don't know if it has anything to do with this problem. diff -r 86de6cbb5d97 -r 0cd

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:22 PM Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > > On 2/15/21 1:40 AM, Olek Wojnar wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:21 PM > > wrote: > > It selects the "Zero" VM, which I assume is the one used on mips64el. > > https://openjdk.java.net/projects/

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

On 2/15/21 1:40 AM, Olek Wojnar wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:21 PM mailto:raphael.jo...@free.fr>> wrote: It selects the "Zero" VM, which I assume is the one used on mips64el. https://openjdk.java.net/projects/zero/ Ah, thanks for the explanation! It helped me to appropriately adjust

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

On 2/15/21 1:40 AM, Olek Wojnar wrote: > Done! [1] Unfortunately, I don't see anything useful there but perhaps one > of you will. > > -Olek > > [1] > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/olekw/32e54c0829d739e8fa88893a853c0fa8/raw/b2fce4d2ab77555a3d28c22441f1de3cb2d99f38/bazel-bootstrap-zero-jre T

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

Thank you all for your inputs and suggestions! On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:43 AM Matthias Klose wrote: > > you could try to debug with java -zero / javac -J-zero on amd64. Done! [1] Unfortunately, I don't see anything useful there but perhaps one of you will. On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:21 PM wr

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 8:56 PM Tiago Daitx wrote: > > Hi, > > This particular exception is being thrown by the call to unlinkat [1] > which calls native unlinkat. Man page for unlinkat describes EISDIR > error [2] as: > "EISDIR pathname refers to a directory, and AT_REMOVEDIR was not > specified

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

Hi, This particular exception is being thrown by the call to unlinkat [1] which calls native unlinkat. Man page for unlinkat describes EISDIR error [2] as: "EISDIR pathname refers to a directory, and AT_REMOVEDIR was not specified in flags." Assuming unlinkat is telling the truth and this is inde

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

It selects the "Zero" VM, which I assume is the one used on mips64el. https://openjdk.java.net/projects/zero/ Raphael Olek Wojnar wrote: Hi Matthias, On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:43 AM Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 2/12/21 10:26 PM, Olek Wojnar wrote: > > > > Any insights or suggestions would b

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

Hi Matthias, On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 2:43 AM Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 2/12/21 10:26 PM, Olek Wojnar wrote: > > > > Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! > > you could try to debug with java -zero / javac -J-zero on amd64. > Sure! What does that flag do, anyway? Something

Re: Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

[also forwarding to the Debian mips porters] On 2/12/21 10:26 PM, Olek Wojnar wrote: > Hello Java Team and OpenJDK Team, > > I'm hesitant to start filing potentially serious bugs at this point in the > release cycle so please let me know if there's something I'm missing in > this situation. > >

Potential bug in openjdk-11 on mips64el

Hello Java Team and OpenJDK Team, I'm hesitant to start filing potentially serious bugs at this point in the release cycle so please let me know if there's something I'm missing in this situation. I've been trying to get the bazel-bootstrap package to build on mips64el. It's *almost* completing n