Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2016-03-29 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 12:16 +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On 08/12/15 12:01, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I was on my way trying to package org.osgi.core 6 and before  > > downloading I have to agree with this page: > > > > https://www.osgi.org/developer/downloads/release-6/rele

Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-09 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 09.12.2015 um 02:18 schrieb Mikołaj Izdebski: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: >> I was on my way trying to package org.osgi.core 6 and before downloading I >> have to agree with this page: >> >> https://www.osgi.org/developer/downloads/release-6/release-6-no-form/ >> >>

Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-09 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 2015-12-09 02:18, Mikołaj Izdebski wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: I was on my way trying to package org.osgi.core 6 and before downloading I have to agree with this page: https://www.osgi.org/developer/downloads/release-6/release-6-no-form/ In the "License Gra

Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-08 Thread Mikołaj Izdebski
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > I was on my way trying to package org.osgi.core 6 and before downloading I > have to agree with this page: > > https://www.osgi.org/developer/downloads/release-6/release-6-no-form/ > > In the "License Grant", it seems that it could be problem

Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-08 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 2015-12-08 13:25, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 8/12/2015 13:01, Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : Any thoughts? As I understand this "license grant" covers the specification. The implementation is licensed under the Apache-2.0 license (which includes a handy patent protection clause). You are right,

Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-08 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 8/12/2015 13:01, Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : > Any thoughts? As I understand this "license grant" covers the specification. The implementation is licensed under the Apache-2.0 license (which includes a handy patent protection clause). Emmanuel Bourg

Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-08 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 08/12/15 12:01, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Hi, I was on my way trying to package org.osgi.core 6 and before downloading I have to agree with this page: https://www.osgi.org/developer/downloads/release-6/release-6-no-form/ In the "License Grant", it seems that it could be problematic to packag

Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-08 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi, I was on my way trying to package org.osgi.core 6 and before downloading I have to agree with this page: https://www.osgi.org/developer/downloads/release-6/release-6-no-form/ In the "License Grant", it seems that it could be problematic to package osgi in Debian. Am I right? Any though