Matthias Klose dixit:
>If you want a reply from the OpenJDK packagers, please feel free to send email
>to them, or at least CC me.
I thought debian-java reached them? I was told to use it…
>If you submit a patch for 6, please always send one for 7 as well. Don't patch
>the upstream source direct
Am 28.11.2012 22:07, schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> Dixi quod…
>
>> If one of you, either java or porter guys, has further suggestions,
>> just tell ☺
>
> That includes if I should stop bothering with -6 and try -7
> immediately, considering reading about #675495 now. The B-D
> are there, nowadays.
>
Dixi quod…
>If one of you, either java or porter guys, has further suggestions,
>just tell ☺
That includes if I should stop bothering with -6 and try -7
immediately, considering reading about #675495 now. The B-D
are there, nowadays.
The goal might be to make m68k a non-gcj arch, so I don’t
know
Hi,
after my thread from June or so, I’ve started another attempt at
building src:openjdk-6 on m68k. Below is my preliminary patch;
any others will follow.
The patch
• fixes behaviour for s390, which uses gcj-4.6 to bootstrap,
to not depend on gcj-4.7 as well
• adds m68k to gcj-4.6 platforms (t
4 matches
Mail list logo
