Hi
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 05:03:22PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> On 11/13/06, Benjamin Mesing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >[Why is it, that nobody honors my request for CC?]
> >
> >Thanks for the answers. I would definitely recommend to create a
> >java5.0-compiler and java5.0-runtime package
On 11/13/06, Benjamin Mesing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Why is it, that nobody honors my request for CC?]
Thanks for the answers. I would definitely recommend to create a
java5.0-compiler and java5.0-runtime package.
I don't like the idea because the development environment is not just
about
[Why is it, that nobody honors my request for CC?]
Thanks for the answers. I would definitely recommend to create a
java5.0-compiler and java5.0-runtime package.
I will use the dependency on sun-java5 for now and put it in contrib.
Regards Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Marcus Better writes:
> Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> > However it requires Java 5.0 and I haven't found any information if
> > there is a 5.0 compatible free java compiler available.
>
> I don't think so, but check GCJ upstream. It's not just the compiler, but
> also the class library that needs
Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> However it requires Java 5.0 and I haven't found any information if
> there is a 5.0 compatible free java compiler available.
I don't think so, but check GCJ upstream. It's not just the compiler, but
also the class library that needs to support some new features, such as
g
[please CC I am not subscribed]
Hello,
I intent to package UMLet [1,2] which is a neat little UML editor.
However it requires Java 5.0 and I haven't found any information if
there is a 5.0 compatible free java compiler available. Also, how would
I specify a dependency on Java 5.0?
Looking at the
I've began packaging gcjlib ant task into a .deb:
http://spindazzle.org/gcjlib/
I've already filled an ITP:
http://bugs.debian.org/310962
And initial package, which passes the lintian tests is available on the
mentors repository:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gcjlib-anttasks/
Fir
What about saving it as a lib and creating a sim-link to it named
/usr/bin/saxon also?
:)
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 1:53 AM
Subject: java packaging questions
> Hi All,
>
> I package some of
What about saving it as a lib and creating a sim-link to it named
/usr/bin/saxon also?
:)
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 1:53 AM
Subject: java packaging questions
> Hi All,
On Monday 25 June 2001 15:53, Mark Johnson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I package some of the DocBook XML stuff and want to package some java
> xslt processing tools as well, but I'm not too clear on a few policy
> points. Any help/suggestions would be much appreciated. Here goes:
>
> 1. Package naming, li
* Mark Johnson
|I have similar questions for other packages I'd like to upload. The
|arbortext catalog classes (and related extensions) that provide
|catalog support for saxon and XT are an example. I could package
|the base classes as "lib-arbortext-java", the saxon extensions as
On Monday 25 June 2001 15:53, Mark Johnson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I package some of the DocBook XML stuff and want to package some java
> xslt processing tools as well, but I'm not too clear on a few policy
> points. Any help/suggestions would be much appreciated. Here goes:
>
> 1. Package naming, l
* Mark Johnson
|I have similar questions for other packages I'd like to upload. The
|arbortext catalog classes (and related extensions) that provide
|catalog support for saxon and XT are an example. I could package
|the base classes as "lib-arbortext-java", the saxon extensions a
Hi All,
I package some of the DocBook XML stuff and want to package some java
xslt processing tools as well, but I'm not too clear on a few policy
points. Any help/suggestions would be much appreciated. Here goes:
1. Package naming, libraries vs. programs, etc.
I recently uploaded an xslt pro
Hi All,
I package some of the DocBook XML stuff and want to package some java
xslt processing tools as well, but I'm not too clear on a few policy
points. Any help/suggestions would be much appreciated. Here goes:
1. Package naming, libraries vs. programs, etc.
I recently uploaded an xslt pr
15 matches
Mail list logo
