Am 02.07.2017 um 01:29 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
>
>
>
>> I can live with another package (that means there are eight new
>> dependencies for pdfsam at the moment). Then I go for
>> src:libpdfbox2-java and drop the libjempbox-java binary package for
>> this
>> source package.
>
> I recommend crea
>I can live with another package (that means there are eight new
>dependencies for pdfsam at the moment). Then I go for
>src:libpdfbox2-java and drop the libjempbox-java binary package for
>this
>source package.
I recommend creating a libpdfbox1-java package instead, otherwise we'll be
forced
On Sat, 01 Jul 2017 18:14:38 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >>> do we still have to do this
> >>> search&replace dance in debian/rules?
> >> You mean the cmap copying back and forth?
> >> Probably not (see below).
> >> And it looks like the whole repackaging needs an update:
> > Yes, I suspect it
Am 01.07.2017 um 17:26 schrieb tony mancill:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 06:29:55PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:54:00 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>>
>>> I dropped the libjempbox-java package because it is no longer
>>> unsupported and was removed upstream. Apparently xmp
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 06:29:55PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:54:00 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> > I dropped the libjempbox-java package because it is no longer
> > unsupported and was removed upstream. Apparently xmpbox is the successor
> > but I don't know if we
g internal command:
mk-origtargz --package libpdfbox-java --version 2.0.6 --compression gzip
--directory .. --copyright-file debian/copyright ../pdfbox-2.0.6-src.zip
No files matched excluded pattern as the last matching glob:
*/pdfbox/src/main/resources/org/apache/pdfbox/resources/cmap/*
uscan info: Ne
Hi,
I have packaged 2.0.6 but I would appreciate if you could take a look at
the changes and possibly fix outstanding issues before I'm going to
upload to experimental.
I dropped the libjempbox-java package because it is no longer
unsupported and was removed upstream. Apparently xmpbox is the suc
Le 29/06/2017 à 10:07, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> Unfortunately src:libpdfbox-java also includes the sources for fontbox.
> The packages can't be updated separately. I could update
> src:libpdfbox-java as a whole or I need to create a new source package,
> say src:libfontbox2-java. I think I do a
Am 29.06.2017 um 09:02 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Le 29/06/2017 à 00:13, Markus Koschany a écrit :
>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Let's just update fontbox, that's the right time to do it and there
> aren't many reverse dependencies. If we fail to port them to the new
> version we can still upload the latest
Le 29/06/2017 à 00:13, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> Thoughts?
Let's just update fontbox, that's the right time to do it and there
aren't many reverse dependencies. If we fail to port them to the new
version we can still upload the latest 1.x version as a separate package
later.
Emmanuel Bourg
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:13:02AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently working on updating pdfsam. As usual there are tons of new
> dependencies. I believe I can manage to package them but at the moment
> I'm stuck at SAMBox and its build-dependency fontbox.
>
> SAMBox is a fork
Hi,
I'm currently working on updating pdfsam. As usual there are tons of new
dependencies. I believe I can manage to package them but at the moment
I'm stuck at SAMBox and its build-dependency fontbox.
SAMBox is a fork of PDFBox' 2.x branch. It requires fontbox 2.0.6 which
is part of the PDFBox p
12 matches
Mail list logo
