Hi Markus,
thanks a lot!
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 03:49:52PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> Thinking about it, the patch could be much simpler. Actually all you
> need is the list of URLs. They are hardcoded but those jar files and
> your build directory probably will never change again.
Yes.
Thinking about it, the patch could be much simpler. Actually all you
need is the list of URLs. They are hardcoded but those jar files and
your build directory probably will never change again. It looks like
netlib-java is unmaintained and changes are unlikely. Please find
attached the updated vers
Control: tags -1 patch
Hello Andreas,
I am attaching a patch that seems to fix the problem. This patch can be
applied on top of the current version in testing, no further changes are
required, but please double-check if the r-deps continue to work. At
least the classes are generated again.
The b
Hi again,
Dominik Stadler commented here:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/netlib-java/commit/da4055377617ea59e92675088be41600e16a326d#note_70898
on my patch. I admit I feel really bad about my patch since I do not
want to override an existing compile target. So I rephrase: Why is the
co
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:58:33AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I realised that
>
> /usr/share/java/netlib-java-0.9.3.jar
>
> is nearly empty, specifically
>
> /org/netlib/arpack
> /org/netlib/blas
> /org/netlib/lapack
>
> do not contain any classes.
> ...
> and the previo
5 matches
Mail list logo
