Re: Moving Eclipse forward

2018-07-13 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 05/07/2018 à 23:46, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > With all this I'm now able to build aspectj/1.8.10 without depending on > the eclipse-platform package. With the new eclipse packages and some tinkering I've been able to build AspectJ 1.9.1 with OpenJDK 10. The upgrade path wasn't obvious, the ve

Re: Moving Eclipse forward

2018-07-11 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Quick update on this front: * I've polished the Ant script and wrote a debhelper buildsystem to further simplify the packaging. The result has been uploaded as a new eclipse-debian-helper package. See the README on Salsa for more information [1]. * equinox-bundles [2] is the first package using e

Equinox upstream repository, Re: Moving Eclipse forward

2018-07-06 Thread Mykola Nikishov
Emmanuel Bourg writes: [...] > Currently libequinox-osgi-java is built from sources fetched on Maven > Central. Maybe we could refactor it to build from it's upstream > repository (https://github.com/eclipse/rt.equinox.framework). According to [1], Eclipse Equinox has multiple upstream reposito

Re: Moving Eclipse forward

2018-07-06 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 06/07/2018 à 07:15, Markus Koschany a écrit : > Good work! It would have been nice though, if you had sent a short > notice to #681726 to avoid double work because I said I would work on > aspectj. I started to bundle the needed eclipse source code with aspectj > but I agree that working soluti

Re: Moving Eclipse forward

2018-07-05 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 05.07.2018 um 23:46 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: [...] Good work! It would have been nice though, if you had sent a short notice to #681726 to avoid double work because I said I would work on aspectj. I started to bundle the needed eclipse source code with aspectj but I agree that working solut

Re: Moving Eclipse forward

2018-07-05 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 05/07/2018 à 23:54, Vincent Privat a écrit : > I would probably have named the first one "src:eclipse-equinox-bundles", > unless there is a good reason not to do that. > Same for "libequinox": why not libeclipse-equinox? It's more verbose, > but I don't know if equinox is known outside of Eclip

Re: Moving Eclipse forward

2018-07-05 Thread Vincent Privat
Great work! I would probably have named the first one "src:eclipse-equinox-bundles", unless there is a good reason not to do that. Same for "libequinox": why not libeclipse-equinox? It's more verbose, but I don't know if equinox is known outside of Eclipse? Cheers, Vincent 2018-07-05 23:46 GMT+02:

Moving Eclipse forward

2018-07-05 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, Among the issues we have to handle for the transition to Java 11 there is a difficult one with aspectj and eclipse. aspectj fails to build with Java 9+ (#873213) and needs an upgrade. Unfortunately this also implies an update of eclipse (aspect/1.8.9 is the last version compiling with ecli