Re: Lucene 3

2010-08-12 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-08-12 09:19, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: > On Wed, August 11, 2010 22:48, Ludovic Claude wrote: >> >> I think that a separate lucene3 package will be required, as there is no >> guaranty that with the API changes an upgrade will work as expect

Re: Lucene 3

2010-08-12 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
On Wed, August 11, 2010 22:48, Ludovic Claude wrote: > > I think that a separate lucene3 package will be required, as there is no > guaranty that with the API changes an upgrade will work as expected. Agreed. I'll prepare a new lucene3 package. I'll try to implement the recommendations from the "Li

Re: Lucene 3

2010-08-11 Thread Ludovic Claude
I think that a separate lucene3 package will be required, as there is no guaranty that with the API changes an upgrade will work as expected. Ludovic Le 11/08/2010 13:54, Jan-Pascal van Best a écrit : Hi all, Lucene 3 has been out for a while. It is not backwards compatible with lucene2

Lucene 3

2010-08-11 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
Hi all, Lucene 3 has been out for a while. It is not backwards compatible with lucene2 (use of Java5 generics, drop deprecated APIs). What should we do with this in Debian? 1. Have a big-bang transition in which we patch al rdeps of lucene2 to work with lucene3. - I'm not sure if this is