>> `gcj' does not support JNI, and in previous inquiries to Cygnus, we
>> did not get get the impression that JNI is a priority. IIRC Tom
>> Tromey said that JNI could be implemented on top of CNI, and that
>> outside contributors are welcome to add it.
Per> I believe Tom is now actually working o
On Monday 20 March 2000, at 10 h 16, the keyboard of Tom Tromey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The current cvs version of gcj handles all JDK 1.1 constructs,
> including inner classes.
Did you try it on a complicated and real program like the XSL processor xt ?
We will have no free XSL processor
Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Resumen
> ---
> Nota de Copyright
> -
> Contenidos
> --
Wrong language ... (Liekwise the dete at the end.)
> * `gcj'. Compiles Java source to native code.
also source to bytecode, or bytecode to native
Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a writes:
> I'm attaching the latest revision I've had time to make to the
> Debian/JAVA faq.. I appreciate new contributions, of course,
It might be worth to add some explicit comments on the SCSL,
and why free software has a problem with Java2. Here's a rough
dra
> "Javier" == Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Javier> Gcj can also compile .java to .class. It currently does
Javier> not handle inner classes, but that is being actively
Javier> worked on.
The current cvs version of gcj handles all JDK 1.1 constructs,
inc
I'm attaching the latest revision I've had time to make to the
Debian/JAVA faq.. I appreciate new contributions, of course, but I think it
might be ready to include in java-common. Opinions? If no one disagress I
will file a wishlist bug against java-common and doc-debian, one to include
t
6 matches
Mail list logo
