On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 02:39:52AM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>
> It would only be nice to move the manpage, so that bug 208025 can also
> be closed.
>
> Daniel
Am I missing something, or will applying the trivial patch for the
90-odd day old RC bug really not take more than 5 minutes? I for
I just sent a 1.1.2 upload into incoming. Lets see what the various platform
builds make of it.
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 14:59, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Those build failures should have been fixed in 1.1.2. They were mostly
> introduced by the new gcc version being more strict about bad code
I just sent a 1.1.2 upload into incoming. Lets see what the various platform
builds make of it.
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 14:59, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Those build failures should have been fixed in 1.1.2. They were mostly
> introduced by the new gcc version being more strict about bad code
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 11:49:59PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:28:58 -0500
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:15:12PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> >
> > > I mean, the fix won't go into stable anyway since it isn't security
> >
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:28:58 -0500
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:15:12PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
>
> > I mean, the fix won't go into stable anyway since it isn't security
> > related, right?
>
> This is a myth that somehow continues to be perpetuated
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:15:12PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I mean, the fix won't go into stable anyway since it isn't security
> related, right?
This is a myth that somehow continues to be perpetuated despite a list of
criteria in every message that Joey sends about point release preparati
bugs from kaffe are resolved (by the 1.1.2 upload and
some work on the man page), and if we wait for ten days (and got not
more bugs), we can ask ftpmaster to put kaffe in testing with an
explanation about the bug tagged 'woody' does not affect the current
release.
I&#
1.1.2 upload and
some work on the man page), and if we wait for ten days (and got not
more bugs), we can ask ftpmaster to put kaffe in testing with an
explanation about the bug tagged 'woody' does not affect the current
release.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Arnaud Vandyck
: :' : http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/
`. `'
`-
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 03:23:44PM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote:
[...]
> >- Tell me whether you think upgrading to 1.1.2, 1.1.3, etc. etc. while
> >we are in freeze is legitimate or whether we need to be backporting
> >patches from CVS.
>
> 1.1.3 is due in 2 weeks. It will be released on time
could you do an update of 1.0.5 first, please? That RC bug[1] is one
of the two[2] holding back kaffe from entering testing from what I see
on [3]. An upload of 1.1.2 will not fix that bug, as it's a bug in
stable, and 1.1.2 is has no chance going into stable until the next
release, sarge, afa
Pierre Machard wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 03:23:44PM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote:
[...]
- Tell me whether you think upgrading to 1.1.2, 1.1.3, etc. etc. while
we are in freeze is legitimate or whether we need to be backporting
patches from CVS.
1.1.3 is due in 2 weeks. It will be released
Hi Ean,
Ean Schuessler wrote:
The problem for me at this point isn't so much a lack of time as it is a
lack of understanding about the release cycle underway. I've heard
varying stories about whether we can or can't upgrade to new upstream
versions. If we can then I've already got 1.1.2 package
The problem for me at this point isn't so much a lack of time as it is
a lack of understanding about the release cycle underway. I've heard
varying stories about whether we can or can't upgrade to new upstream
versions.
Given that kaffe is currently not in testing at all, that it has RC bugs
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 05:34 am, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> The implication is that your time (spent implementing smarter filters and
> teaching them) is more important than mine (trying to teach your filter),
> and I take offense at that.
Actually, the implication is that a challenge/response s
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 08:22:47PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I turned off my TDMA filters since all you wilting flowers couldn't stand
> answering an automated script inquiry. Sure, a nerd will happily play
> tetris all day but God forbid they have to hit "reply" on a spam
> challenge.
The i
The problem for me at this point isn't so much a lack of time as it is a
lack of understanding about the release cycle underway. I've heard
varying stories about whether we can or can't upgrade to new upstream
versions. If we can then I've already got 1.1.2 packaged. You can
download an i386 ve
I turned off my TDMA filters since all you wilting flowers couldn't
stand answering an automated script inquiry. Sure, a nerd will happily
play tetris all day but God forbid they have to hit "reply" on a spam
challenge.
Gawd dern brass-a-frassin no script replyin debianers.
Matt Zimmerman wrot
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:51:39 +0100
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not personally involved in the debian packaging of kaffe, so I
> can't say what Ean's plans are.
I think Ean does not want to upload a newer kaffe because it's nearly
freeze time for Debian...
It would be bette
Hi,
Thanks Dalibor for these great news (and his work on Kaffe itself). So
it seems that upstream 1.1.2 fixes most of the releast-critical problems
of kaffe (except the manpage bug). It would therefore be very important
for Java-on-Debian to have a new package made soon. Ean, can you do it?
If
Daniel Bonniot wrote:
The other bug is a build problem on m68k, so it is probably going to go
away when the builds on (alpha, arm, m68k, s390, sparc) are fixed. Are
these architecture supported upstream? If yes, then maybe Dalibor could
look at the logs and help with diagnosing the problem. If
Salut Arnaud, hi all,
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:20:39 +0100
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Given that a release it coming, it would be really nice if these
issues could be solved. There are at the moment 17 packages prevented
to enter testing because of kaff
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:23:38 +0100
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These should actually be only one (minor/normal level) bug in Debian's
> BTS: "Upstream version 1.1.2 available", right?
yep. two more arguments to upload the 1.1.2 release ;)
--
.''`. Arnaud Vandyck
: :' : http:/
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:14:34PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>
> > There are currently two release-critical bugs and architecture problems
> > that keep kaffe from reentering testing. The details are at
> > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?packag
Two more important bugs (but I did not file it on the bts):
- problem with xml entities (bug introduced by gnujaxp): resolved with
1.1.2
- java.util.TimeZone.SHORT does not exists: resolved with 1.1.2
These should actually be only one (minor/normal level) bug in Debian's
BTS: "Upstream versi
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 13:14:34 -0600 (CST)
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> > There are currently two release-critical bugs and architecture problems
> > that keep kaffe from reentering testing.
> > The details are at http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/te
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:20:39 +0100
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Given that a release it coming, it would be really nice if these
> issues could be solved. There are at the moment 17 packages prevented
> to enter testing because of kaffe. Or looking at it more positively,
>
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There are currently two release-critical bugs and architecture problems
> that keep kaffe from reentering testing.
> The details are at http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kaffe
Why didn't you cc the maintainer of kaffe?
--
To U
Hi,
There are currently two release-critical bugs and architecture problems
that keep kaffe from reentering testing.
The details are at http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kaffe
One of the bugs (the manpage location) seems trivial, and a patch is
attached. Is there a reason why it ha
28 matches
Mail list logo
