Re: Kaffe NMU

2004-01-30 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 29 January 2004 00:03, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > Since that just makes them clutter (files in the package that do > nothing at all) I think we should remove them or clean it out to just > those necessary. As it was an NMU, I did not want t

Re: Kaffe NMU

2004-01-29 Thread Ean Schuessler
On Thursday 29 January 2004 00:03, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > I don't think it's a problem if we have some kaffe specific discussions > here ;) Good, good. > 1° The patches did not apply with the first NMU (of course! I got to >change the patches because of the version number!). So, first, I did

Re: Kaffe NMU

2004-01-28 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This message needs to be on some Kaffe-Debian list but I haven't > gotten around to getting my alioth account going. I don't think it's a problem if we have some kaffe specific discussions here ;) > In the current Kaff

Kaffe NMU

2004-01-26 Thread Ean Schuessler
This message needs to be on some Kaffe-Debian list but I haven't gotten around to getting my alioth account going. In the current Kaffe NMU the DBS patches have all been put in a directory called "no-more-patch". The patches have all pretty much been addressed in upstream.