into JavaFX
This package allows Java developers to easily integrate the Font
Awesome icon font created by Dave Gandy into their JavaFX
applications. This is possible because all icons are scalable vector
graphics and each icon can be styled with CSS.
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Am 22.12.2015 um 22:45 schrieb Jerome Benoit:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Mentors:
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package openviewerfx [1],
> a Java library to manipulate PDF material (which is the
> successor of
Forwarded Message
Subject: Bug#808783: RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer
Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:48:02 +
Resent-From: Jerome Benoit
Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Mentors
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:45:34 +0100
, visualvm, openjfx, icedtea-web)
>
I installed also the openjdk. Now I can start writing JavaFX applications.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Le 6/12/2015 23:36, Cecil Westerhof a écrit :
> I did not invest a lot in Swing. As I understood it new applications
> should be written with JavaFX instead of with Swing. That is not the case?
Oracle supports both frameworks, JavaFX doesn't deprecate Swing. So feel
free to use t
2015-12-06 21:47 GMT+01:00 Emmanuel Bourg :
> Le 6/12/2015 17:17, Cecil Westerhof a écrit :
> > I want to start writing desktop applications. I have done some (but not
> > much) Swing and Qt in the past, but as I understand it I should use
> > JavaFX nowadays.
>
> Sw
Hi Cecil,
Le 6/12/2015 17:17, Cecil Westerhof a écrit :
> I want to start writing desktop applications. I have done some (but not
> much) Swing and Qt in the past, but as I understand it I should use
> JavaFX nowadays.
Swing is still a good API for classic desktop applications.
>
2015-12-06 17:36 GMT+01:00 Jerome BENOIT :
> Hello Forum:
>
> On 06/12/15 17:17, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> > I want to start writing desktop applications. I have done some (but
> > not much) Swing and Qt in the past, but as I understand it I should
> > use JavaFX now
Hello Forum:
On 06/12/15 17:17, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I want to start writing desktop applications. I have done some (but
> not much) Swing and Qt in the past, but as I understand it I should
> use JavaFX nowadays. How should I install JavaFX? I am using Java 7,
> because I do not
I want to start writing desktop applications. I have done some (but not
much) Swing and Qt in the past, but as I understand it I should use JavaFX
nowadays. How should I install JavaFX? I am using Java 7, because I do not
want to use unstable packages without a reason and at the moment I think
/android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/base/+/master/core/java/android/util/JsonWriter.java
>
> https://sources.debian.net/src/openjfx/8u60-b27-4/modules/jmx/src/main/java/com/oracle/javafx/jmx/json/JSONWriter.java/
>
> Perhaps you could use one of these classes?
It appears not co
rc/openjfx/8u60-b27-4/modules/jmx/src/main/java/com/oracle/javafx/jmx/json/JSONWriter.java/
Perhaps you could use one of these classes?
Regards,
Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello List:
On 08/09/15 17:57, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 08.09.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Jerome BENOIT:
>> Hello Forum:
>>
>> I am considering to package jPedal [0,1], or at least to change to ITP the
>> un-activated RFP #547142 [2].
>> Before all, I surprise that it was not yet brought to Debian:
Hi:
Thanks for your reply.
On 08/09/15 17:57, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 08.09.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Jerome BENOIT:
>> Hello Forum:
>>
>> I am considering to package jPedal [0,1], or at least to change to ITP the
>> un-activated RFP #547142 [2].
>> Before all, I surprise that it was not yet bro
Am 08.09.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Jerome BENOIT:
> Hello Forum:
>
> I am considering to package jPedal [0,1], or at least to change to ITP the
> un-activated RFP #547142 [2].
> Before all, I surprise that it was not yet brought to Debian: is ther any
> good reason for that ?
>
Hi,
I'm not aware
Hello Forum:
I am considering to package jPedal [0,1], or at least to change to ITP the
un-activated RFP #547142 [2].
Before all, I surprise that it was not yet brought to Debian: is ther any good
reason for that ?
Thanks,
Jerome
[0] https://www.idrsolutions.com/openviewerfx/
[1] http://source
Hi:
On 13/08/15 23:10, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 13/08/2015 18:23, Jerome BENOIT a écrit :
>
>> Is there a room for javax-1.3.1 in java-package ?
>
> Hi Jerome,
>
> We have JavaFX 8 in Debian, why do you need the old version 1.3.1?
Because some Java software still use
Le 13/08/2015 18:23, Jerome BENOIT a écrit :
> Is there a room for javax-1.3.1 in java-package ?
Hi Jerome,
We have JavaFX 8 in Debian, why do you need the old version 1.3.1?
Emmanuel Bourg
Hello Forum:
Is there a room for javax-1.3.1 in java-package ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
2012-12-24 14:31, Cleto Martín skrev:
> Hi all!
>
> first of all, thanks a lot for your work guys! :-)
>
> I would like to ask you about JavaFX[1] that it is needed in a new
> release of one of my packages (zeroc-ice). I have not found and ITP or
> any mention in this lis
Hi all!
first of all, thanks a lot for your work guys! :-)
I would like to ask you about JavaFX[1] that it is needed in a new
release of one of my packages (zeroc-ice). I have not found and ITP or
any mention in this list. I was wondering if anyone is aware about this
component. If so, it would
21 matches
Mail list logo
