if that page should "help" Debian users, why do you use examples from
other distributions? If you want to "help", why don't you
differentiate between java versions, gcj versions and different
releases? Did you check with recent versions of the these
implemenations? Why start that page with "why
Blackwell writes:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Blackwell a écrit :
> > [...]
> >
> >> Arnaud, I realize that you folks are working on Debian for free. But
> >> that for me is not an acceptable excuse for any kind of decision,
> >> because
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Blackwell a écrit :
[...]
Arnaud, I realize that you folks are working on Debian for free. But
that for me is not an acceptable excuse for any kind of decision,
because what you are doing may (and does) affect me and other p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Blackwell a écrit :
[...]
> Arnaud, I realize that you folks are working on Debian for free. But
> that for me is not an acceptable excuse for any kind of decision,
> because what you are doing may (and does) affect me and other people -
> even die-har
On 16/05/2006 02:04:57, Barry Hawkins wrote:
Jeroen and I are indeed maintaining it, and we are interested in the
change, but Java(TM) 6 will be far more relevant when it is
released. Perhaps you could provide information that helps us
understand the benefit you perceive in packaging a beta
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 03:39:11PM +0200, Blackwell wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >>1) Too work intense approach to integrate Sun Java?
> >>
> >
> >http://www.us.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg
> >http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch5.html#s-license-concer
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
1) Too work intense approach to integrate Sun Java?
http://www.us.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch5.html#s-license-concerns
Hello Arnaud,
Debian is integrating Sun JDK/JRE via some package.
or your work in advance.
> 2) Faking Java on modern Linux distros:
>
> This may seem like the place for a complaint too:
[not sure ;-)]
> Can everyone please stop placing executables called "java" and "javac"
> which are not Java on Linux distributions? Java
too:
Can everyone please stop placing executables called "java" and "javac"
which are not Java on Linux distributions? Java has enough issues,
adding to them like this is not helping, rather the opposite. (It
doesn't help conveying a professional image of the Linux distribu
One more thing:
sdk and jdk are packaged for debian -> see blackdown :)
( http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html to find your
nearest mirror)
Ciao mattHias
--
__ _ __ *
/\_/\ \ \_/ \_/ / * Matthias Wieser *
/ \ \ /
Evan,
That presents a problem. Java itself is free, but Sun's implementation is
not. For this reason, forcing all packages which depend on
`java-virtual-machine' or whatever is pretty unfair. Packages that depend
specifically on Sun's implementation, however, belong in contrib.
Regards,
Alex.
-
One more thing:
sdk and jdk are packaged for debian -> see blackdown :)
( http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html to find your
nearest mirror)
Ciao mattHias
--
__ _ __ *
/\_/\ \ \_/ \_/ / * Matthias Wieser *
/ \ \ /
Evan Prodromou wrote:
"AR" == Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AR> But it will be good to have this in debian dist. This and
AR> others java lib, applications or systems.
It can't be in Debian, since it's not DFSG-Free.
If it can be legally redistributed with Debian, though, it can
Evan,
That presents a problem. Java itself is free, but Sun's implementation is
not. For this reason, forcing all packages which depend on
`java-virtual-machine' or whatever is pretty unfair. Packages that depend
specifically on Sun's implementation, however, belong in contrib.
Regards,
Alex.
> "AR" == Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AR> But it will be good to have this in debian dist. This and
AR> others java lib, applications or systems.
It can't be in Debian, since it's not DFSG-Free.
If it can be legally redistributed with Debian, though, it can go in
non-fre
Colin Michael Yates wrote:
Hi,
Maybe I have missed the point (getting ready to be flamed :-)) but what is
the problem of downloading the Sun JDK and running it on Linux? It is very
easy to configure and use, and although slow, it is very reliable?
Yes, it`s true.
Even if you can't distribute Sun's
Hi,
Maybe I have missed the point (getting ready to be flamed :-)) but what is
the problem of downloading the Sun JDK and running it on Linux? It is very
easy to configure and use, and although slow, it is very reliable?
Even if you can't distribute Sun's JDK with Debian, you can still *use* the
Evan Prodromou wrote:
>> "AR" == Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> AR> But it will be good to have this in debian dist. This and
> AR> others java lib, applications or systems.
>
> It can't be in Debian, since it's not DFSG-Free.
>
> If it can be legally redistrib
> "AR" == Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AR> But it will be good to have this in debian dist. This and
AR> others java lib, applications or systems.
It can't be in Debian, since it's not DFSG-Free.
If it can be legally redistributed with Debian, though, it can go in
non-fr
Colin Michael Yates wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe I have missed the point (getting ready to be flamed :-)) but what is
> the problem of downloading the Sun JDK and running it on Linux? It is very
> easy to configure and use, and although slow, it is very reliable?
Yes, it`s true.
>
> Even if you ca
Hi,
Maybe I have missed the point (getting ready to be flamed :-)) but what is
the problem of downloading the Sun JDK and running it on Linux? It is very
easy to configure and use, and although slow, it is very reliable?
Even if you can't distribute Sun's JDK with Debian, you can still *use* th
On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 11:46:52AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Kaffe fails for every non-trivial program.
I'm running Jigsaw on it, which is a 10 Meg distribution and reasonably
non-trivial. I'm also using it for a clustered tuple-space managed web
server infrastructure that we've built he
On Friday 12 November 1999, at 17 h 8, the keyboard of Dave Swegen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> linux if at all possible. So my main question is: What is the state of java
> under linux?
Under Linux, I don't know. Under Debian, you have a nice set of free and good
Java compilers in the current
Next week my MSc's java course is starting, and I'd like to do it under
linux if at all possible. So my main question is: What is the state of java
under linux? I don't believe we'll be doing anything exceptionally complex
(the final program for the course will be a simple drawing program AFAIK).
I
24 matches
Mail list logo
