Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-10 Thread Paul Wise
On 7/11/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My buildd can do builds before packages enter the archive. E.g. I've used it to rebuild all packages build-depending on ant before I uploaded ant 1.7.0 into the archive to make sure it dont break too much. This way I found a breakage in ow-util

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-10 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 09:55:22AM +1000, Paul Wise wrote: > On 7/2/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I have setup a local buildd locally to be able to testbuild all packages > >maintained by the Debian Java Maintainers. In the first test builds only > >the usual suspects failed whi

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-10 Thread Paul Wise
On 7/2/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have setup a local buildd locally to be able to testbuild all packages maintained by the Debian Java Maintainers. In the first test builds only the usual suspects failed which have already filed FTBFS bugs in the BTS. I suggest contacting Lu

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-10 Thread Michael Koch
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:46:32AM +0100, Paul Cager wrote: > Is it possible to set up the build environment so that access to the > network will fail (after downloading the Build-depends of course)? I'm > thinking of packages that attempt to download binary blobs (e.g. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-10 Thread Paul Cager
Michael Koch wrote: > Hello list, > > > I have setup a local buildd locally to be able to testbuild all packages > maintained by the Debian Java Maintainers. In the first test builds only > the usual suspects failed which have already filed FTBFS bugs in the > BTS. > > I would like to provide th

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-02 Thread Marcus Better
Michael Koch wrote: > This is a single-cpu/single-core machine. That fits the pattern. The problem seems to hit SMP machines. Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-02 Thread Michael Koch
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 01:36:19PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: > > The buildf failed but differently: > > > > > > [junit] Running org.dom4j.xpath.MatrixConcatTest > > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0.833 sec > > Ok, so the ThreadingTest

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-02 Thread Marcus Better
Michael Koch wrote: > The buildf failed but differently: > > > [junit] Running org.dom4j.xpath.MatrixConcatTest > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0.833 sec Ok, so the ThreadingTest succeeded at least. Could you send me the test result for the MatrixConcatTest

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-02 Thread Michael Koch
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:53:17AM +0200, Marcus Better wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: > > the usual suspects failed which have already filed FTBFS bugs in the > > BTS. > > What was the result for dom4j? I would like to have more data on #427456. > What is the arch and CPU of the build system? The

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-02 Thread Marcus Better
Michael Koch wrote: > the usual suspects failed which have already filed FTBFS bugs in the > BTS. What was the result for dom4j? I would like to have more data on #427456. What is the arch and CPU of the build system? Regards, Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Java buildd service

2007-07-02 Thread Michael Koch
Hello list, I have setup a local buildd locally to be able to testbuild all packages maintained by the Debian Java Maintainers. In the first test builds only the usual suspects failed which have already filed FTBFS bugs in the BTS. I would like to provide this service to be able to test all the