Hi
Whilst I can see that being unable to install sun-java6 from sid is
annoying, you should be able to work around it easily enough.
Depending on your exact requirements you could either install sun-java5 or
install 6-00-2 from testing, or grab 6-04-2 from
http://snapshot.debian.net/sun-jav
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:54:27PM +0200, VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN wrote:
> > Hmm, how can a problem with a package in non-free (Sun's java) can
> > affect the installation of a package in main (openoffice.org) ? (by
> > definition of main, a package in main cannot depend on anything not in
> > m
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:01 PM, VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > The java6 packages don't appear to be buggy as such, the problem is that
>> the
>> > i386 packages haven't been built. That sort of temporary version skew is
>>
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:01 PM, VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The java6 packages don't appear to be buggy as such, the problem is that
> the
> > i386 packages haven't been built. That sort of temporary version skew is
> > normal for sid, (and for package
>
> The java6 packages don't appear to be buggy as such, the problem is that the
> i386 packages haven't been built. That sort of temporary version skew is
> normal for sid, (and for packages in main would normally be fixed by the
> i386 buildd).
This depends what you mean by temporary. This h
On Friday 04 April 2008 23:18, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> > Ian Bull wrote:
> > > Did you run apt-get update before that ? As far as I can see,
> > > this problems does not exist anymore.
> > >
> > > Thank for the reply Vincent.
> > >
> > > Yep, I tired an update first:
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what's going on here but there are already several bug reports
> on
> this, the latest I think is bug #464721 (which dates back to Feb 8th).
>
> The sun-java6-* packages have been uninstallable for
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Ian Bull wrote:
> > Did you run apt-get update before that ? As far as I can see, this
> > problems does not exist anymore.
> >
> > Thank for the reply Vincent.
> >
> > Yep, I tired an update first:
>
> OK, I've checked a bit better. The problem still exist
Ian Bull wrote:
I have looked around and this doesn't seem to be a known issue, but I
can't seem to install sun-java6-
$ apt-get install sun-java6-jre sun-java6-bin
The following packages have unmet dependencies.
sun-java6-bin: Depends: sun-java6-jre (= 6-04-2) but 6-05-1 is to be
installed
>
> Did you run apt-get update before that ? As far as I can see, this
> problems does not exist anymore.
>
> Thank for the reply Vincent.
Yep, I tired an update first:
# apt-get update
Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org experimental Release.gpg
Ign http://ftp.us.debian.org experimental/main Translat
Ian Bull wrote:
> Did you run apt-get update before that ? As far as I can see, this
> problems does not exist anymore.
>
> Thank for the reply Vincent.
>
> Yep, I tired an update first:
OK, I've checked a bit better. The problem still exists for the i386
arch. Please wait for a few
Hello,
Ian Bull wrote:
> I have looked around and this doesn't seem to be a known issue, but I
> can't seem to install sun-java6-
>
> $ apt-get install sun-java6-jre sun-java6-bin
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies.
> sun-java6-bin: Depends: sun-java6-jre (= 6-04-2) but 6-0
I have looked around and this doesn't seem to be a known issue, but I can't
seem to install sun-java6-
$ apt-get install sun-java6-jre sun-java6-bin
The following packages have unmet dependencies.
sun-java6-bin: Depends: sun-java6-jre (= 6-04-2) but 6-05-1 is to be
installed
sun-java6-jre: De
13 matches
Mail list logo
