Re: Java 1 and 2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Charles Fry wrote: >>>There was a recent message about Java 1 versus 2 runtimes in Provides >>>(if I remember correctly). I've brought this up before, suggesting that >>>those two be combined. Is there any reason not to combine the >>>java-runtime and

Re: Java 1 and 2

> > There was a recent message about Java 1 versus 2 runtimes in Provides > > (if I remember correctly). I've brought this up before, suggesting that > > those two be combined. Is there any reason not to combine the > > java-runtime and java-compiler virtual packages? If not I suggest that > > we p

Java 1 and 2

There was a recent message about Java 1 versus 2 runtimes in Provides (if I remember correctly). I've brought this up before, suggesting that those two be combined. Is there any reason not to combine the java-runtime and java-compiler virtual packages? If not I suggest that we proceed to do so. ch