Hello
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 06:26:52PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ola> Well. Do they have any reason for this?
>
> Concerns about the redistribution of code that Debian has been
> distributing for longer than the five years I've
Hello
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 06:26:52PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ola> Well. Do they have any reason for this?
>
> Concerns about the redistribution of code that Debian has been
> distributing for longer than the five years I've
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> Well. Do they have any reason for this?
Concerns about the redistribution of code that Debian has been
distributing for longer than the five years I've been a DD.
Actually, having to think about this again has helped me make up my
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> Well. Do they have any reason for this?
Concerns about the redistribution of code that Debian has been
distributing for longer than the five years I've been a DD.
Actually, having to think about this again has helped me make up my
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:59:25AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ola> You actually say that they allow jdk1.1 to be in the archives
> Ola> but not updates to it?
>
> Yep. Impressive, huh!
Well. Do they have any reason for this?
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:59:25AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ola> You actually say that they allow jdk1.1 to be in the archives
> Ola> but not updates to it?
>
> Yep. Impressive, huh!
Well. Do they have any reason for this?
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> You actually say that they allow jdk1.1 to be in the archives
Ola> but not updates to it?
Yep. Impressive, huh!
--
Stephen
"A duck!"
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> You actually say that they allow jdk1.1 to be in the archives
Ola> but not updates to it?
Yep. Impressive, huh!
--
Stephen
"A duck!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:04:19PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben> The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing from at
> Ben> all.
>
> I got your message and will be including the change in the next j2se
> packages. I wo
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:04:19PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben> The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing from at
> Ben> all.
>
> I got your message and will be including the change in the next j2se
> packages. I wo
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing from at
Ben> all.
I got your message and will be including the change in the next j2se
packages. I won't beincluding it in the jdk1.1 package because the
ftp-nasters have alread
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing
Ben> from at all.
--
Stephen
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety -- Benjamin Franklin
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing from at
Ben> all.
I got your message and will be including the change in the next j2se
packages. I won't beincluding it in the jdk1.1 package because the
ftp-nasters have alread
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing
Ben> from at all.
--
Stephen
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety -- Benjamin Franklin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
> Do you know why they have not done anything. Have they responded at all?
The kaffe maintainer wrote when I sent the second (source-level) patch and
said he'd take a look. The sablevm maintainer replied to my post from
yesterday; you've seen that. The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard
n
> Do you know why they have not done anything. Have they responded at all?
The kaffe maintainer wrote when I sent the second (source-level) patch and
said he'd take a look. The sablevm maintainer replied to my post from
yesterday; you've seen that. The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard
n
W liście z pią, 07-02-2003, godz. 10:11, Ola Lundqvist pisze:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 06:53:12PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
> > In the intervening three months, absolutely nothing has been done for *any*
> > of
> Do you know why they have not done anything. Have they responded at all?
Your chang
Hi
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 06:53:12PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi, it's me yet again on this JNI issue.
>
> > My suggestion is that you start filing wishlist bugs against the jvm:s
> > and talk to blackdown folk (hi there! ;) ) or similar.
W liście z pią, 07-02-2003, godz. 10:11, Ola Lundqvist pisze:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 06:53:12PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
> > In the intervening three months, absolutely nothing has been done for *any* of
> Do you know why they have not done anything. Have they responded at all?
Your change wil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, it's me yet again on this JNI issue.
> My suggestion is that you start filing wishlist bugs against the jvm:s
> and talk to blackdown folk (hi there! ;) ) or similar.
Well, I filed these wishlist bugs, complete with wrapper scripts that would
i
Hi
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 06:53:12PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi, it's me yet again on this JNI issue.
>
> > My suggestion is that you start filing wishlist bugs against the jvm:s
> > and talk to blackdown folk (hi there! ;) ) or similar.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, it's me yet again on this JNI issue.
> My suggestion is that you start filing wishlist bugs against the jvm:s
> and talk to blackdown folk (hi there! ;) ) or similar.
Well, I filed these wishlist bugs, complete with wrapper scripts that would
i
22 matches
Mail list logo
