That would be good for me. I'm repackaging 1.1.1 with DBS so hopefully I
can get it out the door quick enough to no longer require the NMU.
Quoting Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'll be away a couple of days next week to it will be best if I delay
> the NMU by one week so I can quickly
That would be good for me. I'm repackaging 1.1.1 with DBS so hopefully I
can get it out the door quick enough to no longer require the NMU.
Quoting Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'll be away a couple of days next week to it will be best if I delay
> the NMU by one week so I can quickly
Stefan Gybas wrote:
Anthony's mail also mentions a liberal policy for NMUs between next
Saturday and September 14th. I will therefore NMU Kaffe 1.1.1 next
Monday (August 25th) if Ean has not uploaded his package until than.
I'll be away a couple of days next week to it will be best if I delay
th
Stefan Gybas wrote:
Anthony's mail also mentions a liberal policy for NMUs between next
Saturday and September 14th. I will therefore NMU Kaffe 1.1.1 next
Monday (August 25th) if Ean has not uploaded his package until than.
I'll be away a couple of days next week to it will be best if I delay
t
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 19:06, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Takashi Okamoto wrote:
>
> > So, ant depends on a lot of packages. Should we put them into main in
> > the first for putting ant into main?
>
> Almost all of these dependecies are for ant-optional.jar. However, most
> other Java packages will on
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 19:06, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Takashi Okamoto wrote:
>
> > So, ant depends on a lot of packages. Should we put them into main in
> > the first for putting ant into main?
>
> Almost all of these dependecies are for ant-optional.jar. However, most
> other Java packages will on
Takashi Okamoto wrote:
So, ant depends on a lot of packages. Should we put them into main in
the first for putting ant into main?
Almost all of these dependecies are for ant-optional.jar. However, most
other Java packages will only need ant.jar to build so I think it makes
sense to split ant-1.5.
Takashi Okamoto wrote:
So, ant depends on a lot of packages. Should we put them into main in
the first for putting ant into main?
Almost all of these dependecies are for ant-optional.jar. However, most
other Java packages will only need ant.jar to build so I think it makes
sense to split ant-1.5
From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Intend to NMU Kaffe 1.1
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:59:14 +0200
> As soon as libant1.5-java has been accepted by the FTP masters, I'll
> upload libservlet2.2-java for main and start working on some other Java
> library package
From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Intend to NMU Kaffe 1.1
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:59:14 +0200
> As soon as libant1.5-java has been accepted by the FTP masters, I'll
> upload libservlet2.2-java for main and start working on some other Java
> library package
Hi!
Anthony has posted a release plan for sarge a few hours ago
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html).
I'm sure that he will not delay the release because of some Java
packages in contrib that did not make it to main in time, so we really
Hi!
Anthony has posted a release plan for sarge a few hours ago
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html).
I'm sure that he will not delay the release because of some Java
packages in contrib that did not make it to main in time, so we reall
12 matches
Mail list logo
