Adam Heath wrote:
I suggest having a libhsqldb-java anyways. Other packages make use of
hypersonic(in embedded form), and will have various version requirements.
The current version has been renamed libhsqldb-java, at
//coyotesong.com/java/.
Bear
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Adam Heath wrote:
The industry is wrong.
It's ultimately irrelevant. Either the packaging helps people get
their job done or it gets in the way, and if it gets in the way
people will avoid it.
Bear
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Bear Giles wrote:
> The latter is one reason why I believe that ultimately the
> conventional shared library approach is flawed for Java. The
> industry, or at least the part I'm involved with, is moving
> towards self-contained WAR or EAR files that have their own copies
> of
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Bear Giles wrote:
> hsqldb: /usr/share/java/hsqldb.jar, documentation, and scripts to
> run the database as a service. I haven't rewritten the stock
> scripts to follow Debian standards yet -- I'm not even sure it's
> practical since the scripts must specify the directory con
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 16:08:07 -0700
Bear Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Second, I really have no interest in getting involved in the
Debian project directly.
I thought you were. By the way, IMHO these two packages are very
interresting and it's a go
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 16:08:07 -0700
Bear Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > Why not send ITP's to wnpp at the BTS?
>
> First, I don't know what most of the acronyms are, just ITP.
Sorry.
ITP=Intent To Package.
BTS=Bug Tracking System.
WNPP=Work Needed and Prospective P
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:18:19 -0700
1000 packages in /java/ !
Over 1000 packages in a modified testing, perhaps 50 java packages
built to local conventions in a separate repository. With that
many packages you tend to use custom scripts heavily.
Why not send ITP's to wnpp a
On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:18:19 -0700
Bear Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two of the packages are up at http://coyotesong.com/java/. It's
> not set up to support apt-get yet - ironically I have a local
> repository with over 1000 recompiled packages ('testing'
> recompiled against the static
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 23:18, Bear Giles wrote:
> I've run into some problems recompiling libxdoclet-java, so I
> don't have a time frame for it.
>
> Anyway, since my packages haven't been redistributed I haven't
> been worried about using the Sun packages when convenient. These
> have been co
Two of the packages are up at http://coyotesong.com/java/. It's
not set up to support apt-get yet - ironically I have a local
repository with over 1000 recompiled packages ('testing'
recompiled against the static libc and perl packages), but the
tools to maintain that monster don't port well t
I thought that Java on Debian was pretty much dead, glad to see I
was mistaken.
I'm currently Debianizing a number of Java package that I've been
using locally. I made them apt-friendly, but they were otherwise
entirely independent of the Debian project.
The first three packages up are all st
11 matches
Mail list logo
