Re: ITP: openjdk-compiler

2006-11-22 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 07:47 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 09:04:26PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > We are not completely there yet though. > > Thanks a lot for that information. I'll try to dig further into this > in order to make it buildable with things from only m

Re: ITP: openjdk-compiler

2006-11-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 16:53 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:55:24PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote: > > > I have now determined that it can build using itself as compiler > > > (If I make a preliminary version bootstrapped with binary sun javac). > > > > Then it would hav

Re: ITP: openjdk-compiler

2006-11-14 Thread Marcus Better
> I have now determined that it can build using itself as compiler > (If I make a preliminary version bootstrapped with binary sun javac). Then it would have to go in non-free unfortunately. Can the bootstrap compiler be built with gcj instead? Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: ITP: openjdk-compiler

2006-11-14 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:55:24PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote: > > I have now determined that it can build using itself as compiler > > (If I make a preliminary version bootstrapped with binary sun javac). > > Then it would have to go in non-free unfortunately. Can the bootstrap > compiler be buil

Re: ITP: openjdk-compiler

2006-11-14 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 12:46:36PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > On 11/14/06, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hi > > > >Some people may remember that I was working for a couple of years > >on the java-policy, but stopped that after a while because it was so > >hard to get things wo

Re: ITP: openjdk-compiler

2006-11-14 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 11/14/06, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Some people may remember that I was working for a couple of years on the java-policy, but stopped that after a while because it was so hard to get things working as Sun java was the "standard" and it could not go to main, or even non-free

Re: ITP: openjdk-compiler

2006-11-14 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Some people may remember that I was working for a couple of years on the java-policy, but stopped that after a while because it was so hard to get things working as Sun java was the "standard" and it could not go to main, or even non-free at that time. Now when Sun has changed their mind on thi

Re: ITP: openjdk-compiler

2006-11-13 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 11/14/06, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Hi Ola, I have now determined that it can build using itself as compiler (If I make a preliminary version bootstrapped with binary sun javac). However it seems to require the jvm from sun to compile though... You need a jdk to bootstr

Re: ITP: openjdk-compiler

2006-11-13 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi I have now determined that it can build using itself as compiler (If I make a preliminary version bootstrapped with binary sun javac). However it seems to require the jvm from sun to compile though... /bin/cp src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/resources/javac_zh_CN.properties build/classes

ITP: openjdk-compiler

2006-11-13 Thread Ola Lundqvist
I just wanted to inform you on the debian-java list that I have filed an ITP on openjdk-compiler that was released today. I hope that I can compile it using only free software, so that it can go to main. However if it really requires the class libraries from sun then we have to wait some more for