Thorsten Glaser writes:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Reason: POM 'org.richfaces:richfaces-bom' not found in repository: System
> > is offline.
> >
> > org.richfaces:richfaces-bom:pom:debian
>
> I think you reached the point of yak-shaving: where you
> have to package th
Le 20/07/2014 23:20, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Any idea what I'm doing wrong here?
You have done nothing wrong. This project uses a kind of dependency I
wasn't aware of and I don't think maven-debian-helper handles it
properly. shrinkwrap-bom is imported with a scope 'import', this is new
to me.
Hi again,
just for the record: mh_make keeps on failing to create a valid debian/ dir
for me: I downloaded
https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-core/archive/1.1.5.Final.tar.gz
untared it and did run mh_make by ignoring anything that was missing and ended
up again in:
...
Resolving org.
Hi Thorsten,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:01:15PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Reason: POM 'org.richfaces:richfaces-bom' not found in repository: System
> > is offline.
> >
> > org.richfaces:richfaces-bom:pom:debian
>
> I think you reached the point of yak-shaving: where you
> have to pack
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Reason: POM 'org.richfaces:richfaces-bom' not found in repository: System is
> offline.
>
> org.richfaces:richfaces-bom:pom:debian
I think you reached the point of yak-shaving: where you
have to package this dependency for Debian first, before
you c
Hi Emmanuel,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:15:22PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 18/07/2014 13:57, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> > Is the solution to get at least "some" debian packaging stuff by ignoring
> > javax.mail?
>
> Yes I think so, as I understand this is the only dependency you didn't
Le 18/07/2014 13:57, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Is the solution to get at least "some" debian packaging stuff by ignoring
> javax.mail?
Yes I think so, as I understand this is the only dependency you didn't
ignore.
Regarding javamail, the package is in NEW but can be replaced
temporarily by libg
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 01:30:09PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 18/07/2014 13:27, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> > I went trough the whole mh_make process by trying to hit y/n/
> > wherever it seemed to be reasonable but there is even no such thing like
> > a log file. I attached a tarball of t
Le 18/07/2014 13:27, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> I went trough the whole mh_make process by trying to hit y/n/
> wherever it seemed to be reasonable but there is even no such thing like
> a log file. I attached a tarball of the debian/ as it was created.
>
> Do you get something else?
I just need
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 01:17:36PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 18/07/2014 13:09, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> > Is this because of the missing dependencies or is anything else wrong
> > here?
>
> This is probably caused by the missing dependencies. I suggest to just
> ignore them, write them
Le 18/07/2014 13:09, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Is this because of the missing dependencies or is anything else wrong
> here?
This is probably caused by the missing dependencies. I suggest to just
ignore them, write them down for later investigation, and continue the
mh_make process. The resulting
Hi Emmanuel,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:14:38AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > What would be the correct answer at this point of the process.
>
> The right answer here is: s/.*/debian/
> But mh_make shouldn't ask as there is not ambiguity here, I'll see if I
> can improve that. If you install t
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > dpkg --search /usr/share/java/commons-fileupload.jar
> dpkg failed to execute successfully
> > apt-file search /usr/share/java/commons-fileupload.jar
> Found libcommons-fileupload-java
IIUC, this is the point where you should back out,
apt-get insta
Le 17/07/2014 06:25, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> What would be the correct answer at this point of the process.
The right answer here is: s/.*/debian/
But mh_make shouldn't ask as there is not ambiguity here, I'll see if I
can improve that. If you install the libcommons-fileupload-java package
befo
Hi Emmanuel,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 , Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> When dealing with a Maven project you "just" have to checkout the code
> and run mh_make. If all goes well this will create the packaging files
> and match the dependencies with the Debian packages.
I checked this and was stumbling upon
Le 16/07/2014 22:34, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Any hint would be really welcome.
Hi Andreas,
When dealing with a Maven project you "just" have to checkout the code
and run mh_make. If all goes well this will create the packaging files
and match the dependencies with the Debian packages.
I took
Hi,
I intend to package imeji[1] in Debian Science team. Unfortunately I'm
not that skilled with Java packaging. For maven based packages I found
MavenBuilder[2] but this page looks quite outdated refering to
debhelper (>= 5), cdbs, openjdk-6-jdk
which lloks somehow ancient. I wonder if so
17 matches
Mail list logo
