Re: GlassFish 3.x

2013-05-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 12/05/2013 18:25, tony mancill a écrit : > A question for the list... There are a number rdeps on the current > glassfish binary packages. Is there any reason to keep GF 2 in the > archive? That is, should there be a new package for glassfish3, or > should the 3.x update replace the existing

Re: GlassFish 3.x

2013-05-12 Thread tony mancill
On 05/11/2013 08:43 AM, Markus Karg wrote: > Understood. How to find out whether any other people currently work on > the same idea? Hi Markus, You're definitely in the right place. In addition to the other suggestions in this thread, I recommend that you start by generating a list dependencies

Re: GlassFish 3.x

2013-05-11 Thread Felix Natter
To: debian-java@lists.debian.org >> Subject: Re: GlassFish 3.x >> >> Le 11/05/2013 13:51, Markus Karg a écrit : >> > I noticed that even jessie and sid both still provide the same >> > outdated GlassFish 2.x release, while there is GlassFish 3.x release >&g

RE: GlassFish 3.x

2013-05-11 Thread Markus Karg
Understood. How to find out whether any other people currently work on the same idea? > -Original Message- > From: Matthias Klose [mailto:d...@debian.org] > Sent: Samstag, 11. Mai 2013 17:41 > To: Markus Karg > Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Gla

Re: GlassFish 3.x

2013-05-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 11.05.2013 17:31, schrieb Markus Karg: > So if I am reading correctly between the lines your answer means, that I > have to start completely from scratch, do all the work on my own, and > there are no current plans by anybody to support GF 3.x already? I > wonder what then actually is the idea o

RE: GlassFish 3.x

2013-05-11 Thread Markus Karg
> Sent: Samstag, 11. Mai 2013 17:37 > To: debian-java@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: GlassFish 3.x > > Le 11/05/2013 13:51, Markus Karg a écrit : > > I noticed that even jessie and sid both still provide the same > > outdated GlassFish 2.x release, while there is GlassFis

Re: GlassFish 3.x

2013-05-11 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 11/05/2013 13:51, Markus Karg a écrit : > I noticed that even jessie and sid both still provide the same outdated > GlassFish 2.x release, while there is GlassFish 3.x release available > since years. I am an experienced Java Programmer and GlassFish > administrator and would love t

RE: GlassFish 3.x

2013-05-11 Thread Markus Karg
? > -Original Message- > From: Felix Natter [mailto:fnat...@gmx.net] > Sent: Samstag, 11. Mai 2013 16:30 > To: Markus Karg > Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: GlassFish 3.x > > "Markus Karg" writes: > > hello Markus, > > > I no

Re: GlassFish 3.x

2013-05-11 Thread Felix Natter
"Markus Karg" writes: hello Markus, > I noticed that even jessie and sid both still provide the same outdated > GlassFish 2.x release, while > there is GlassFish 3.x release available since years. I am an experienced > Java Programmer and GlassFish > administrator and

GlassFish 3.x

2013-05-11 Thread Markus Karg
I noticed that even jessie and sid both still provide the same outdated GlassFish 2.x release, while there is GlassFish 3.x release available since years. I am an experienced Java Programmer and GlassFish administrator and would love to see jessie to provide 3.x instead of 2.x. What do I have to