Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-11-08 Thread Alexandre Rossi
> I didn't see any issue in GWT's issue tracker about our problems with > crockford's library. Could you open an issue there? Maybe we could get > upstream do to anything in this regard. > There are also other issues for the keyword "json" and it seems that somebody > is working in this area. I ad

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-11-08 Thread Thomas Koch
Alexandre Rossi: > >> - liborgjson-java (json library from http://json.org/java ) > > > > please be careful: this is considered non-free code because of the 'evil > > clause'. There is some older version which is free but I do not remember > > the details atm. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-l

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-09-11 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 09:08:01AM +0200, Alexandre Rossi a écrit : > > I'd like to setup repositories for gwt and its dependencies that are > missing in debian unstable and that I packaged : > - jsilver and its build dep sablecc > - liborgjson-java (json library from http://json.org/java ) > > W

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-09-06 Thread Alexandre Rossi
>> - liborgjson-java (json library from http://json.org/java ) > > please be careful: this is considered non-free code because of the 'evil > clause'. There is some older version which is free but I do not remember > the details atm. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/03/msg00065.html Than

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-09-06 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Alexandre, sorry I am in a hurry and have no time for a full answer. Am 06.09.2011 09:08, schrieb Alexandre Rossi: > - liborgjson-java (json library from http://json.org/java ) please be careful: this is considered non-free code because of the 'evil clause'. There is some older version which

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-09-06 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi all, A little status update. I have gwt-dev.jar, gwt-user.jar building with external dependencies. It does not work : I cannot compile my GWT application. From the error message, I think my naive patch to port to jdt 3.5+ is not good, so this will need more work. I'd like to setup repositories

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-09-01 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 07:42:37AM +0200, Alexandre Rossi a écrit : > > I'll now share my work at the following URL: > http://sousmonlit.dyndns.org/~niol/gitweb/?p=gwt-debian.git/.git;a=summary > > This also should work : > $ git clone > http://sousmonlit.dyndns.org/~niol/repositories.git/gwt-de

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-09-01 Thread Alexandre Rossi
> I would probably not use "org.eclipse.jdt.core_3.5.2.v_981_R35x.jar", > since the last part of a version in eclipse jars has been known to be > volatile. Done. > Consider a wildcard like "org.eclipse.jdt.core_3.5.2.*.jar" and please > check it works with eclipse 3.7 (in experimental). It buil

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-09-01 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi all, I'll now share my work at the following URL: http://sousmonlit.dyndns.org/~niol/gitweb/?p=gwt-debian.git/.git;a=summary This also should work : $ git clone http://sousmonlit.dyndns.org/~niol/repositories.git/gwt-debian.git/.git (git is easier to work with without commit access, I'll con

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-08-31 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-08-31 18:46, Alexandre Rossi wrote: > Dear all, > > Please find attached a patch against the current packaging svn > svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-eucalyptus/gwt/trunk . > > It make it possible to build gwt-dev.jar . > > I'll continue working towards building gwt-user.jar (when I get the > ch

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-08-31 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Dear all, Please find attached a patch against the current packaging svn svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-eucalyptus/gwt/trunk . It make it possible to build gwt-dev.jar . I'll continue working towards building gwt-user.jar (when I get the chance), but I wanted to share my work in case people were tackl

Re: [pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers] GWT2 packaging

2011-08-25 Thread Steffen Möller
I agree, no prob for me since I am with pkg-java already. And given my limited history in gwt maintenance it is very kind of yours to have asked in the first place. The number of esp. external contributors will be lower in git ... if a move towards that could be delayed? Many thanks and regards

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-08-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 05:36:35PM +0200, Alexandre Rossi a écrit : > > >From the Debian bug report[1], works seems to be occurring : > $ svn co svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-eucalyptus/gwt/trunk > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/624205 Dear all, I think that if more packages start to depend on gwt, it

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-08-25 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, > I'd also need gwt2 to package gerrit. > Is there an ITP to follow? A GIT repo with your packaging so far? Have you > documented the missing dependencies somewhere? >From the Debian bug report[1], works seems to be occurring : $ svn co svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-eucalyptus/gwt/trunk [1] http:

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-08-25 Thread Thomas Koch
Alexandre Rossi: > I have begun working on this. The first problem is that it does not > compile against jdt 3.5 (sid version) but jdt 3.4. The first thing I > wanted to try was to embed jdt 3.4. Hi Alex, how's life? And the gwt2 packaging? :-) I'd also need gwt2 to package

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-07-31 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 à 09:36 +0200, Olivier Sallou a écrit : > Hi, > my package (and certainly others) uses GWT 2. > This version is not packaged in Debian, and maintainers did not answered > my requests to know if it was planned (via mail and bug request). I think they would be happy to hav

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-07-27 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, > my package (and certainly others) uses GWT 2. > This version is not packaged in Debian, and maintainers did not answered > my requests to know if it was planned (via mail and bug request). Same here. > GWT is quite huge and seems really a pain to packagedue to dependencies. > So I wonder i

GWT2 packaging

2011-07-27 Thread Olivier Sallou
Hi, my package (and certainly others) uses GWT 2. This version is not packaged in Debian, and maintainers did not answered my requests to know if it was planned (via mail and bug request). GWT is quite huge and seems really a pain to packagedue to dependencies. So I wonder if someone is intending