Re: GR: Removal of non-free

2004-01-03 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 20:47, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I thought there were some Java systems which could go in Debian now. > > Is that correct? If so, why aren't those things you named in main? I > > have heard that the contrib Tomcat is a particular irrita

Re: GR: Removal of non-free

2004-01-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Ava, Ava Arachne Jarvis wrote: [Dalibor Topic - Fri, 2 Jan 2004 07:54:14 PM CST] I remember when kaffe was really dragging its feet at the beginning---kind of like our research project :) ---but things seem to have really picked up. A picture says more than words: http://www.kaffe.org/~robil

Re: GR: Removal of non-free

2004-01-02 Thread Ava Arachne Jarvis
[Dalibor Topic - Fri, 2 Jan 2004 07:54:14 PM CST] > Ant works fine for me, too, when I set JAVA_HOME to where kaffe is > installed, and set -Dbuild.compiler=kjc when I invoke ant as in. > > ant -Dbuild.compiler=kjc > > Jetty works, too, afaik. I need to pay more attention to these things, but

Re: GR: Removal of non-free

2004-01-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Kalle, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: [I think it is best to involve the people who actually know about the status and not take my word for it - I'm probably wrong.] MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I thought there were some Java systems which could go in Debian now. Is that correct? If so, why aren'

Re: GR: Removal of non-free

2004-01-02 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
[I think it is best to involve the people who actually know about the status and not take my word for it - I'm probably wrong.] MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I thought there were some Java systems which could go in Debian now. > Is that correct? If so, why aren't those things you named in